1980
DOI: 10.1021/ac50064a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle size independent spectrometric determination of wear metals in aircraft lubricating oils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common variants of SOA are inductively coupled plasma (ICP) and rotating disc electrode; these are usually conducted in accordance with a standard such as ASTM D5185. 5 The limited particle size detection range can be slightly improved for some variants of SOA by a method called acid digestion 6 that essentially dissolves particles up to about 30 mm into the fluid and then uses a variant of the SOA technique. Acid digestion requires manual processing of the sample and handling of acids and is generally not employed by commercial laboratories for routine samples.…”
Section: Soamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common variants of SOA are inductively coupled plasma (ICP) and rotating disc electrode; these are usually conducted in accordance with a standard such as ASTM D5185. 5 The limited particle size detection range can be slightly improved for some variants of SOA by a method called acid digestion 6 that essentially dissolves particles up to about 30 mm into the fluid and then uses a variant of the SOA technique. Acid digestion requires manual processing of the sample and handling of acids and is generally not employed by commercial laboratories for routine samples.…”
Section: Soamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback is the high viscosity of the sample, which makes it almost impossible to generate an aerosol by means of a conventional nebulizer (i.e., pneumatic concentric type). Hence, the analytical methods proposed [1][2][3][4][5][6] usually include a sample treatment such as: (i) dilution with organic solvents; [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] (ii) wet or dry acid digestion, [19][20][21][22] sometimes followed by organic dilution [23][24][25][26] or liquid-liquid extraction with an organic solvent; 27 (iii) emulsification by means of surfactants; [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] or (iv) heating the sample to reduce its viscosity. 10,[36][37][38] These procedures involve several drawbacks: (i) low analysis throughput; (ii) dilution of the sample; (iii) risk of contamination; and (iv) risk of analyte losses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saba and Eisentraut (55, 56) proposed a "particle size independent method" for pre-treating lubricating oil samples in the late 1970s and continued this work in the 1980s (57,58). They used organic solvents and acid mixtures; their acid mixtures always contained HF together with other acids, while their organic solvents were MIBK or a MIBK/isopropyl alcohol mixture.…”
Section: Oil Emulsionsmentioning
confidence: 99%