2003
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690491208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle‐size distribution effects in batch adsorption

Abstract: Mathematical models for pore-diffusion-controlled batch adsorption that take an ar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Staby et al [35] determined the particle size distributions of commercially available Toyopearl SP-650 C and SP-550 C and found them to be much wider, with a mean particle size of 80 μm for both adsorbents using Coulter counting and of 93 and 78 μm for SP-650 C and SP-550 C respectively using SEM. Transport modeling can account for the particle size distribution of the adsorbent [36][37][38], but the adsorbents studied here lie within sufficiently narrow distributions to allow monodispersity to be assumed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Staby et al [35] determined the particle size distributions of commercially available Toyopearl SP-650 C and SP-550 C and found them to be much wider, with a mean particle size of 80 μm for both adsorbents using Coulter counting and of 93 and 78 μm for SP-650 C and SP-550 C respectively using SEM. Transport modeling can account for the particle size distribution of the adsorbent [36][37][38], but the adsorbents studied here lie within sufficiently narrow distributions to allow monodispersity to be assumed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…A good fit including the long tailing portion of the breakthrough curve could again be obtained accounting for the PSD with a value D e = e p D p = 2.3 10 ±7 cm 2 /s. The relevant equations accounting for the PSD are discussed in [36].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…With the best fit D e -value uptake rates are underpredicted for short times and overpredicted for long times, when all but the largest particles are completely saturated. However, accounting for the actual particle size distribution (PSD) (see [36] for the relevant equations) provides an excellent fit with D e = e p D p = 2.9 10 ±7 cm 2 /s, in good agreement with the values determined from isocratic and LGE experiments. Interestingly, the effect of the PSD is much less important when the isotherm is linear [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, all the simulated breakthrough curves contained a tailing, which the models could not predict. This phenomenon may result from the extra-column effects as well as the particle size distributions [25]. Displacement of impurities or protein dimmers may also play a role when adsorption is close to equilibrium.…”
Section: Simulation Of Breakthrough Curvescontrasting
confidence: 44%