2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment transported in meltwater from the Gangotri Glacier, central Himalaya — An indicator of subglacial sediment evacuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) and their grain size distributions are typical of proglacial river sediments (Fig. 7), which are generally dominated by silt-size particles between 6 and 20 µm (Fenn and Gomez, 1989;Haritashya et al, 2010). This observation is in agreement with the present-day setting of Golfo Elefantes, where the sediment is supplied by the 8 km long proglacial Gualas river.…”
Section: Sedimentary Processessupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) and their grain size distributions are typical of proglacial river sediments (Fig. 7), which are generally dominated by silt-size particles between 6 and 20 µm (Fenn and Gomez, 1989;Haritashya et al, 2010). This observation is in agreement with the present-day setting of Golfo Elefantes, where the sediment is supplied by the 8 km long proglacial Gualas river.…”
Section: Sedimentary Processessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Under this scenario, the ice front would have retreated by ∼10 km during the last 900 yr. While this may appear as a large fluctuation, this interpretation is supported by historical (Fenn and Gomez, 1989;Haritashya et al, 2010). The distributions demonstrate that lithological units A (1500-1009 cm) and C (740-0 cm) are typical of proglacial sediments.…”
Section: Gualas Glacier Variability During the Last 5400 Yrmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These difficulties are confounded by the fact that each individual ablation season can be markedly different (Hodgkins et al 2003;Jobard and Dzikowski 2006;Stott and Mount 2007;Cockbum and Lamoureux 2008;Haritashya et al 2010), and that sediment sources evolve through the ablation season (Hodson et al 1998;Swift et al 2002;Haritashya et al 2010). Walling (1978) suggests that 10 years of monitoring are required before the sediment transport system o f a catchment can be adequately characterized; however, Warburton (1990) comments that because o f the rapid rate of change and condensed frequency of geomorphic events in the proglacial zone, multi-year studies are subject to many of the same limitations.…”
Section: Proglacial Sediment Budget Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glaciers store water during cool and/or wet periods and release water during warm and/or dry periods. Glaciers are powerful agents of erosion that abrade and fracture substrate, making it available for various erosion processes and transport downstream (Dirszowsky 2004;Haritashya et al 2010). The suspended sediment load o f glaciated rivers (1-90% ice covered watershed) is higher than the global average (Gumell et al 1996); this load can be even higher during deglaciation as a result o f elevated meltwater production and sediment availability (Gumell et al 1999;Menounos et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation