1994
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Removal By Focused Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical removal events are shown in the companion videotape to Brereton and Bruno [5]. The relative insensitivity of this effect to distance from the beam focus suggested that streaming might drive this effect.…”
Section: B Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Typical removal events are shown in the companion videotape to Brereton and Bruno [5]. The relative insensitivity of this effect to distance from the beam focus suggested that streaming might drive this effect.…”
Section: B Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The extreme importance of the van der Waals force to micron particle removal can be appreciated by comparing its size with the gravitational force on a spherical particle, which is given by (5) For particles on the order of a micron, !…”
Section: A Van Der Waals Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So far several qualitative and quantitative techniques such as electrostatic extraction (Hirato et al 1991), Karl Fischer titration test (Steven 1991), distillation (Timothy 1994) and electric dehydration method (Brereton and Bruno 1994) have been reported to determine water content in oils. Among them, the standard distillation method [Dean and Stark distillation method (Dean and Stark 1920)] is regarded to be one of the most mature detecting methods, but is a fairly burdensome method and needs a substantial sample volume to guarantee the accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%