2023
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle-in-cell modelling of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Abstract: Context. Sufficiently far from the Sun, all comets go through a phase of low activity. Rosetta observations at large heliocentric distances of approximately 3 au showed that the plasma at a low-activity comet is affected by both steady state electric fields and low-frequency waves. Aims. Our goal is to provide a model for the electric fields in the inner coma at a low-activity comet and to simulate waves and field structures farther away from the nucleus. Methods. We compare analytical models for the convectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gunell and Goetz (2023) used particle‐in‐cell (PIC) modeling to determine the electric fields around the nucleus, and compared with an analytical electric‐field model similar to the one in Nilsson et al. (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gunell and Goetz (2023) used particle‐in‐cell (PIC) modeling to determine the electric fields around the nucleus, and compared with an analytical electric‐field model similar to the one in Nilsson et al. (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amitis has been extensively applied to study plasma interactions with various planetary bodies including the Moon, Mercury, Ganymede, Mars, Comets, and several asteroids (e.g., Fatemi et al, 2017;Fuqua-Haviland et al, 2019;Fatemi et al, 2020;Aizawa et al, 2021;Poppe et al, 2021;Rasca et al, 2022;Fatemi et al, 2022;Shi et al, 2022;X.-D. Wang et al, 2023;Poppe & Fatemi, 2023;Gunell et al, 2024). In addition, its results have been successfully validated through comparison with spacecraft observations (e.g., Fatemi et al, 2017Fatemi et al, , 2020Aizawa et al, 2021;Rasca et al, 2022;Fatemi et al, 2022;X.-D. Wang et al, 2023), theories (Fuqua-Haviland et al, 2019), and other kinetic and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models (Fatemi et al, 2017;Aizawa et al, 2021).…”
Section: Amitis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%