2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-010-0602-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle focusing in microfluidic devices

Abstract: Focusing particles (both biological and synthetic) into a tight stream is usually a necessary step prior to counting, detecting, and sorting them. The various particle focusing approaches in microfluidic devices may be conveniently classified as sheath flow focusing and sheathless focusing. Sheath flow focusers use one or more sheath fluids to pinch the particle suspension and thus focus the suspended particles. Sheathless focusers typically rely on a force to manipulate particles laterally to their equilibriu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
280
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
280
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The results demonstrated in this study will be practically important in the design of microflow cytometer, a miniaturized device used to count or sort cells [11][12][13] . The ability to focus particles in a spatially narrow stream is a prerequisite in such equipment to accurately manipulate the cells 11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. The results demonstrated in this study will be practically important in the design of microflow cytometer, a miniaturized device used to count or sort cells [11][12][13] . The ability to focus particles in a spatially narrow stream is a prerequisite in such equipment to accurately manipulate the cells 11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The results demonstrated in this study will be practically important in the design of microflow cytometer, a miniaturized device used to count or sort cells [11][12][13] . The ability to focus particles in a spatially narrow stream is a prerequisite in such equipment to accurately manipulate the cells 11 . However, the methods currently in use-active focusing by electric or acoustic forces and passive focusing such as inertial focusing-demand complicated structures, as they require generating external fields or secondary flows, and further their throughputs are restricted by a narrow range of flow rates 11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[4][5][6] Microfluidic systems have been proven to be promising tools for particle/cell manipulation with higher sensitivity and accuracy than their macroscale counterparts. The last decade has seen extensive development of microfluidic approaches for particle/cell manipulation that resort to immunocapture, 7 externally applied physical fields, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] microfiltration, 19,20 gravitational sedimentation, 21 or deterministic lateral migration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be truly competitive with standard instrumentation, these microfluidic devices should satisfy several challenging constraints: (i) a high throughput, necessary to process large amounts of samples in a reasonable amount of time; (ii) a low pressure drop over the microfluidic device, which basically means low fluidic resistance, thus allowing vacuum driven flows; (iii) optical accessibility inside the microchannel to allow high quality optical detection 3 . Moreover, a fundamental requirement is the capability to perform 3D particle focusing that forces the cells to flow one behind the other to enable enhanced optical alignment with better signal 4,5 . Unfortunately, due to the intrinsic 2D nature of the standard fabrication techniques, this achievement is difficult to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%