2015
DOI: 10.1111/mice.12165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle–Fluid–Structure Interaction for Debris Flow Impact on Flexible Barriers

Abstract: Flexible barriers are increasingly used for the protection from debris flow in mountainous terrain due to their low cost and environmental impact. However, a numerical tool for rational design of such structures is still missing. In this work, a hybrid computational framework is presented, using a total Lagrangian formulation of the Finite Element Method (FEM) to represent a flexible barrier. The actions exerted on the structure by a debris flow are obtained from simultaneous simulations of the flow of a fluid… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(37 reference statements)
4
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrodynamic forces at the moving boundary are accomplished by introducing an additional collision term for nodes covered partially or fully by the solid and a weighting function involving the solid fraction within a computational cell. Because of its precise representation of the particle boundary, well computational stability, and efficiency, the IMB has been widely used in the coupled DEM‐LBM technique where a few thousand particles immersed in the fluid can be considered . The immersed boundary (IB) scheme, the last approach, was introduced to the lattice Boltzmann method by Feng and Michaelides and examined by a couple of researchers .…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hydrodynamic forces at the moving boundary are accomplished by introducing an additional collision term for nodes covered partially or fully by the solid and a weighting function involving the solid fraction within a computational cell. Because of its precise representation of the particle boundary, well computational stability, and efficiency, the IMB has been widely used in the coupled DEM‐LBM technique where a few thousand particles immersed in the fluid can be considered . The immersed boundary (IB) scheme, the last approach, was introduced to the lattice Boltzmann method by Feng and Michaelides and examined by a couple of researchers .…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macroscopic behaviour is obtained by resolving the microscopic/mesoscopic interparticle forces in discrete element method (DEM). The fluid‐solid coupling and fluid flow in pores can be approached by the mesoscopic particle‐based methods, such as smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) . In these fluid solvers, the governing equations of fluid flow are algebraic equations rather than differential equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional rigid barriers, flexible barriers are easy and economical for installations and replacements, especially in inaccessible mountainous regions where debris flows occur frequently. In urban areas, flexible barriers are also popular for debris‐resisting since their presence is not excessively intrusive for the surrounding environment . Although the design of rigid barriers has accumulated rich engineering experience, it cannot be directly applied to the design of flexible barriers, due to totally different mechanical characteristics of the two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No firm guidelines built upon sounded theoretical basis are available for flexible barrier design. Only limited experimental and numerical studies have been reported recently . Reliable characterization and modeling of debris flow and its impacts on a flexible barrier hinge on realistic consideration of the three‐way coupling and interactions among the debris fluid, the debris solid and the flexible barrier structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To attenuate the dynamic impact force generated by debris flow and mitigate the subsequent destructive effects, many debris flow prevention and control engineering, such as debris flow barriers, debris racks and fences, debris-flow retention structures and debris breakers [26][27][28][29][30], are applied. Nevertheless, present design of these structures usually refers to empirical models [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%