2017
DOI: 10.5802/afst.1560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Filters for nonlinear data assimilation in high-dimensional systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the Gaussian assumption of EnKF‐based methods, a more universal method, that is, PF, adopting Monte Carlo and importance sampling, has been successfully introduced in LDA to solve the non‐Gaussian/nonlinear assumption (Moradkhani, Hsu, et al., 2005; Van Leeuwen, 2017), which demonstrated that PF is superior to EnKF in several synthetic tests (DeChant & Moradkhani, 2012; Kivman, 2003). However, the MCMC resampling method subjectively determines the resampling step and acceptance probability of the candidate points, hence artificially enforcing the convergence of the sampled parameter values to a too narrow distribution.…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Innovations In Land Data Assi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the Gaussian assumption of EnKF‐based methods, a more universal method, that is, PF, adopting Monte Carlo and importance sampling, has been successfully introduced in LDA to solve the non‐Gaussian/nonlinear assumption (Moradkhani, Hsu, et al., 2005; Van Leeuwen, 2017), which demonstrated that PF is superior to EnKF in several synthetic tests (DeChant & Moradkhani, 2012; Kivman, 2003). However, the MCMC resampling method subjectively determines the resampling step and acceptance probability of the candidate points, hence artificially enforcing the convergence of the sampled parameter values to a too narrow distribution.…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Innovations In Land Data Assi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After identifying the particular PF implementation best suited to the problem, an appropriate likelihood function needs to be defined to compute the conditional probability of the observations given the model state. When dealing with a large number of measurements, which might have correlated errors, the proposed likelihood distribution should ideally be the joint pdf of all these measurements (van Leeuwen, 2017). This implies that in SAR-based flood extent assimilation, where the pixel-wise flood inundation values constitute separate measurements and the images are often characterized by a multimodal histogram, a nonparametric approach to estimating the likelihood function must be chosen.…”
Section: Data Assimilation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the problem of forecast, we want to get the estimation of x k given the measurements {y 1 , y 2 , ..., y k }. Under the Bayesian rule, we have [35]:…”
Section: Particle Filter a Basic Particle Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iv. Calculate the weights and normalize according to (33), ( 34) and (35). v. Obtain the analyzed state x a k and covariance P k of the states according to (36) and (37).…”
Section: Generate Initial Values With N Ensemble Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%