2010
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2010.486015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Emissions from Domestic Gas Cookers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerosol size distributions measured for breakfast and lunch preparations are very similar to those measured by other authors [29] for domestic gas cooker burning methane with the mode at about 10 nm, suggesting a negligible contribution from food (i.e., milk heating and rice boiling). As expected, for such measurements, the main contribution was due to methane burning, because of the negligible emissions deriving from the food.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Aerosol size distributions measured for breakfast and lunch preparations are very similar to those measured by other authors [29] for domestic gas cooker burning methane with the mode at about 10 nm, suggesting a negligible contribution from food (i.e., milk heating and rice boiling). As expected, for such measurements, the main contribution was due to methane burning, because of the negligible emissions deriving from the food.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Previous emission tests have shown that the nucleation mode particles emitted from residential home appliances using CNG mainly contain carbonaceous compounds, such as PAHs and oxygenated-PAHs. ,, The presence of the sulfur in the fuel has the potential to increase or decrease net particle emission depending on competing effects for different chemical components in the particles. , The majority of the sulfur in the fuel oxidizes to form gas-phase SO 2 with a small fraction forming sulfuric acid that increases particle emissions. SO 2 in the flame can oxidize soot particles leading to a reduction in particle emissions. ,, UFP emissions rates in the current appliance tests summarized in Figures b,c and generally follow a pattern with higher ER PN and ER PM associated with higher fuel sulfur content. Generally speaking, appliance ER PN and ER PM are higher for facility #2 biomethane (sulfur content = 2.8 ppm) and facility #1 biomethane (sulfur content = 2.4 ppm) and lower for pipeline CNG (sulfur content = 0.5 ppm) and facility #3 biomethane (sulfur content = 0.8 ppm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact factors that influence UFPs emissions from natural gas combustion are not completely understood, but studies suggest that both carbonaceous materials in the fuel and trace impurities such as sulfur-containing compounds can contribute to UFP formation. , Natural gas contains percent-level concentrations of alkanes besides CH 4 (ethane, propane, butane, etc. ). , Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) is usually the major sulfur-containing compound in natural gas but sulfur-containing odorants are also added for safety . Switching from natural gas to biogas/biomethane changes the concentrations of these UFP precursors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas jet is sprayed with a nozzle of diameter of 1,5 mm and then the air-NG mixture flows out through the holes around the burner cap. There are 20 holes in the form of rectangular slots and located on the outer ring of the burner head of 65.5 mm diameter [13], [14], [15] and [11].…”
Section: Experimental 211 System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%