2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(00)00304-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle detection for future g factor measurements of Coulomb excited radioactive beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the previous designs for this kind of reaction chamber [13,14], a cylinder of 2 mm thick aluminum was selected.…”
Section: General Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the previous designs for this kind of reaction chamber [13,14], a cylinder of 2 mm thick aluminum was selected.…”
Section: General Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of this mechanism a high spin alignment is observed, the velocity of the excited projectiles is maximized and the number of detected recoil particles close to 01 is increased, which improves the probability to detect coincident particle-γ events [5]. In contrast to the g-factor measurements with stable beams, the scattered beam cannot be simply stopped behind the target in a Ta foil, because this would adversely affect in the γ-ray detection increasing the background, as it was discussed in [5,6,14] and references therein. For this reason particle detection using a circular Si detector in the forward direction is not an option when measuring with radioactive beams.…”
Section: Particle Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is great interest in determining the spectroscopic properties of nuclei around the doubly magic 132 50 Sn 82 . The determination of magnetic moments in this region will add significant information on details of specific wavefunctions.…”
Section: Te: Production Of Activity In One Accelerator By the Isol Te...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last twenty five years, the RIV technique was somewhat limited by the difficulty in obtaining calibrations of the hyperfine interactions for particular electronic configurations, ion velocities and the atomic number, Z, of the nucleus. However, RIV has been revived recently, stimulated by a successful experiment on the 2 + 1 state in 132 Te produced as a radioactive beam [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%