2018
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxy033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Concentrations in Occupational Settings Measured with a Nanoparticle Respiratory Deposition (NRD) Sampler

Abstract: There is an increasing need to evaluate concentrations of nanoparticles in occupational settings due to their potential negative health effects. The Nanoparticle Respiratory Deposition (NRD) personal sampler was developed to collect nanoparticles separately from larger particles in the breathing zone of workers, while simultaneously providing a measure of respirable mass concentration. This study compared concentrations measured with the NRD sampler to those measured with a nano Micro Orifice Uniform-Deposit I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, personal equipment allows to monitor exposure levels in worker's breathing zone and are small and lightweight enough to be carried over an eight-hour shift, without compromising any activity carried out by the worker (Asbach et al, 2017;Tsai et al, 2012). Generally, personal sampling is considered the preferred method since it provides an accurate representation of the worker's exposure regarding inhalable, thoracic or respirable particle fractions (Stebounova et al, 2018). Table 2 presents a general overview of the existing methods and available instrumentation for ANP quantification.…”
Section: Methods For Workplace Exposure Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, personal equipment allows to monitor exposure levels in worker's breathing zone and are small and lightweight enough to be carried over an eight-hour shift, without compromising any activity carried out by the worker (Asbach et al, 2017;Tsai et al, 2012). Generally, personal sampling is considered the preferred method since it provides an accurate representation of the worker's exposure regarding inhalable, thoracic or respirable particle fractions (Stebounova et al, 2018). Table 2 presents a general overview of the existing methods and available instrumentation for ANP quantification.…”
Section: Methods For Workplace Exposure Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A heavy vehicle machining and assembly center and an iron foundry were selected based on the similarities in the composition of particulate matter: Fe, Cu and Mn that were detected in a preliminary study at both sites. (45) The machining center produces construction and forestry equipment. Metal and metal oxide PM including nanoparticles were generated by robotic and manual metal inert gas (MIG) welding as well as metal parts grinding at this site.…”
Section: Test Sites and Sampling Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both locations, sampling was performed during three days using a field sampling cart placed in multiple areas of interest as described in detail previously. (45) Size-resolved analysis of the INPs was carried out using the nano-MOUDI (Model 125-R, MSP Corporation, Shoreview, MN). The nano-MOUDI was operated at 10 L/min with 13 greased polycarbonate (PC) substrates (0.2 μm, 47 mm, Sterlitech Corporation, Kent, WA) as previously reported.…”
Section: Test Sites and Sampling Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effective deposition to the foam was tested using sodium chloride aerosol, and up to 19 mg loading of metal fume was generated from welding rods using spark discharge. Field studies included testing against a device providing aerosol size distributions in three workplace situations [78]. Good correlations were found in the two workplaces (a heavy vehicle machining and assembly facility and a shooting range) where the aerosol was not dominated by large particles, but the correlation was not so good at an iron foundry where 95% of the particles were >1 µm aerodynamic equivalent diameter.…”
Section: It's All About the Size: How Should We Measure Exposure To Nmentioning
confidence: 99%