Immersion freezing is the most relevant heterogeneous ice nucleation mechanism through which ice crystals are formed in mixed-phase clouds. In recent years, an increasing number of laboratory experiments utilizing a variety of instruments have examined immersion freezing activity of atmospherically relevant ice nucleating particles 5 25 pended samples and higher for the dry-dispersed aerosol samples between about −26 and −18 • C. Only instruments making measurement techniques with wet suspended samples were able to measure ice nucleation above −18 • C. A possible explanation for the deviation between −26 and −18 • C is discussed. In general, the seventeen immersion freezing measurement techniques deviate, within the range of about 7 • C in terms of temperature, by three orders of magnitude with respect ton s . In addition, we show evidence that the immersion freezing efficiency (i.e.,n s ) of illite NX particles is relatively independent on droplet size, particle mass in suspension, particle 5 15 using an identical reference samples, will help to compare IN measurement methods that are not included in the present study and, thereby, IN data from future IN instruments. els and knowledge of the abundance of INPs (Hoose and Möhler, 2012;Murray et al., 2012).A small subset of all particles acts as INPs across a range of subzero temperatures, triggering ice formation in clouds via the process of heterogeneous ice nucleation. Previous laboratory experiments have taken diverse approaches in an attempt to mimic 5 ice nucleation and freezing processes. These heterogeneous ice formation processes include deposition nucleation, immersion-, condensation-and contact freezing (Vali, 1985), inside-out contact freezing (i.e., freezing of an immersed INP contacting the droplet surface from the inside; Durant and Shaw, 2005;Fornea et al., 2009) and surface condensation freezing (i.e., freezing of supercooled water or residual aqueous 10