2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/97
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Acceleration at Quasi-Parallel Shock Waves: Theory and Observations at 1 Au

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observational results affirm particle acceleration at the shock as the acceleration mechanism. Suprathermal particles from the background solar wind were found to be efficiently injected into the DSA mechanism, in agreement with Neergaard−Parker and Zank (2012) [40]. Giacalone concluded that: "...…”
Section: Association Of Gradual Sep Events With Shock Wavessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observational results affirm particle acceleration at the shock as the acceleration mechanism. Suprathermal particles from the background solar wind were found to be efficiently injected into the DSA mechanism, in agreement with Neergaard−Parker and Zank (2012) [40]. Giacalone concluded that: "...…”
Section: Association Of Gradual Sep Events With Shock Wavessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This mechanism creates a plateau in the energetic particle flux observed during the passage of a shock past an observer. [40] and Giacalone (2012) [41]. Figure 3 illustrates the hypothesis of Tylka et al The study [13] also emphasizes that shock geometry evolves (from quasi-perpendicular to quasi-parallel) as the shock propagates from the Sun, thus introducing different seed populations at different radial distances.…”
Section: Composition Of the Pre-accelerated Particlesmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…p max is the maximum particle momentum (energy) to which a particle may be accelerated and depends on individual shock characteristics, background magnetic field, and the amplitude of the turbulence. The upstream particle distribution can have two components, the background upstream injection distribution ϕ(p), sometimes modeled as a Maxwellian or kappa distribution (Neergaard Parker & Zank 2012;Neergaard Parker et al 2014), or a mono-energetic delta function injected at the shock itself (Melrose & Pope 1993;Reames 2012) as a possible seed population, ψ(p). Therefore, the total upstream distribution then is…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the electron distributions measured in the IPM can be fitted with the κdistributions with κ e ∼ 2 − 5, while the proton distributions prefer a somewhat larger κ p (Pierrard & Lazar 2010). Us-ing in situ spacecraft data, Neergaard-Parker & Zank (2012) suggested that the proton spectra observed downstream of quasi-parallel interplanetary shocks can be explained by the injection from the upstream (solar-wind) thermal Maxwellian or weak κ-distribution with κ p 10. On the other hand, Neergaard-Parker et al (2014) showed that the upstream suprathermal tail of the κ p = 4 distribution is the best to fit the proton spectra observed downstream of quasi-perpendicular interplanetary shocks 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%