1999
DOI: 10.1300/j059v10n02_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory Research as Social Work Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PAR asserts that experiential knowledge is a valid form of expertise (Altpeter, Schopler, Galinsky, & Pennell, 1999) and that "given the proper tools, the people most affected by a problem are not only capable of better understanding their realities, but are also the best equipped to address their struggles" (Koirala-Azad & Fuentes 2009. PAR aims to eliminate power differentials between professional researchers and community experts, and uses critical reflection that legitimizes personal and emotional experiences in the framing of knowledge (Fook & Askeland, 2007), with the ultimate goal of influencing social change (Brydon-Miller, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAR asserts that experiential knowledge is a valid form of expertise (Altpeter, Schopler, Galinsky, & Pennell, 1999) and that "given the proper tools, the people most affected by a problem are not only capable of better understanding their realities, but are also the best equipped to address their struggles" (Koirala-Azad & Fuentes 2009. PAR aims to eliminate power differentials between professional researchers and community experts, and uses critical reflection that legitimizes personal and emotional experiences in the framing of knowledge (Fook & Askeland, 2007), with the ultimate goal of influencing social change (Brydon-Miller, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 25 years, the landscape of social work and social science research has shifted towards methodologies that have critically examined and challenged more traditional positivist/naturalist approaches. Critical thinkers, such as Foucault (Gordon, 1980) and Freire (1970), feminist researchers (Eichler & Lapointe, 1985; Harding, 1987; Spender, 1981; Valentine, 2007), new ethnographists (Manning & Fabrega, 1976), sub-altern and post-colonial scholars (Chaturvedi, 2012; Gandi, 1998; Guha & Chakrovrty Spivak, 1988; Memmi, 2013), and community-based and participatory action researchers (Altpeter, Schopler, Galinsky, & Pennell, 1999; de Koning & Martin, 1996; Higginbottom, & Liamputtong, 2015; Israel, Schulz, Paker, & Becker, 1998; Minkler & Wallerstein, 2003; Reason & Bradbury, 2001; Rodriquez & Brown, 2009) have all brought a deeper critical lens to bear on issues such as power, voice, representation and interpretation, to name just a few. This article picks up on this discourse by examining ‘research as construct’ (Cannella & Lincoln, 2009), interrogating the static notion of ‘research’ as an objective instrument of social science inquiry.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides ample opportunities for the participants to witness, participate and take ownership of the process of interpretation and meaning making. Engaging participants in a variety of data collection/analysis/mobilization processes has long been a significant dimension of participatory action research (Altpeter et al., 1999; Cahill, 2007; Cornwall & Jewkes, 1995; Hall, 1992). One of the ways our framework was established, we argue, was through monetary remuneration.…”
Section: A Research Framework To Navigate Power Differentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ethic suggests that those who experience a phenomenon are the most qualified to investigate it. As an alternative research method that involves clients in research, participatory research emphasizes the integral relationship among practice, research, and a commitment to social change (Altpeter et al, 1999).…”
Section: The Ethic Of Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%