“…In the last 25 years, the landscape of social work and social science research has shifted towards methodologies that have critically examined and challenged more traditional positivist/naturalist approaches. Critical thinkers, such as Foucault (Gordon, 1980) and Freire (1970), feminist researchers (Eichler & Lapointe, 1985; Harding, 1987; Spender, 1981; Valentine, 2007), new ethnographists (Manning & Fabrega, 1976), sub-altern and post-colonial scholars (Chaturvedi, 2012; Gandi, 1998; Guha & Chakrovrty Spivak, 1988; Memmi, 2013), and community-based and participatory action researchers (Altpeter, Schopler, Galinsky, & Pennell, 1999; de Koning & Martin, 1996; Higginbottom, & Liamputtong, 2015; Israel, Schulz, Paker, & Becker, 1998; Minkler & Wallerstein, 2003; Reason & Bradbury, 2001; Rodriquez & Brown, 2009) have all brought a deeper critical lens to bear on issues such as power, voice, representation and interpretation, to name just a few. This article picks up on this discourse by examining ‘research as construct’ (Cannella & Lincoln, 2009), interrogating the static notion of ‘research’ as an objective instrument of social science inquiry.…”