Participatory modeling to support gender equality

Abstract

Purpose – Interventions to support gender equality in organisations are often unsuccessful. Stakeholders disagree about the causes and problem definition of gender equality or pay lip service to the principle of gender equality, but fail to implement gender equality in practice. The purpose of this paper is to examine participatory modelling as an intervention method to support stakeholders in: reaching a shared problem definition and analysis of gender inequality; and identifying and implementing policies to tackle gender inequality. Design/methodology/approach – The authors apply participatory modelling in case studies on impediments to women’s careers in two Dutch universities. Findings – This study shows that participatory modelling supported stakeholders’ identification of the self-reinforcing feedback processes of masculinity of norms, visibility of women and networking of women and the interrelatedness between these processes. Causal loop diagrams visualise how the feedback processes are interrelated and can stabilise or reinforce themselves. Moreover, they allow for the identification of possible interventions. Research limitations/implications – Further testing of the causal loop diagrams by quantifying the stocks and the flows would validate the feedback processes and the estimated effects of possible interventions. Practical implications – The integration of the knowledge of researchers and stakeholders in a causal loop diagram supported learning about the issue of gender inequality, hereby contributing to transformative change on gender equality. Originality/value – The originality of the paper lies in the application of participatory modelling in interventions to support gender equality.

Conforming, accommodating, or resisting? How parents in academia negotiate their professional identity

“…The case study university had 14% women full professors in 2014, which was below the Dutch average of 17% (LNVH 2015). We conducted interviews and focus groups with leaders of each of the five schools of the university as part of a larger multi-method case study into the underrepresentation of women at this Dutch university (Bleijenbergh, and Van Engen 2015). The project was initiated by the first author, an academic in this university, with the aim to increase gender equality in this organization.…”

Gender equality in emergency medicine: Ignorance isn't bliss

“…Gender equality interventions may be directed at changing organisational structures or supporting the agency of individuals within organisations. Interventions directed at increasing organisational responsibility for gender equality are more successful than those focusing on training managers, mentoring and networking groups . However, boosting organisational responsibility will likely enhance those interventions targeting individual agency …”

“…Strategies for change in each generation of physicians will differ, and a multimodal approach must be adopted . Commitment within the hospital culture may be lacking because of Stakeholders not perceiving gender equality as an issue, Stakeholders not agreeing on causes of gender inequality, Interventions that fail during the design or implementation phase. …”

Seeing the system: Systemic gender knowledge to support transformational change towards gender equality in science

“…One of these roads concerns the knowledge that organization members have about processes and practices (re)creating gender inequality. Though knowledge never is a sole or sufficient condition for change, scholars do argue that it is important that organization members know how gender inequality results from gender inequality processes and practices (Benschop, Holgersson, Van den Brink, & Wahl, 2015;Benschop & Van den Brink, 2014;Bird, 2011;Bleijenbergh & Van Engen, 2015;Bustelo, Ferguson, & Forest, 2016;Ely & Meyerson, 2000b). The argument is that, once organization members are knowledgeable about how organizational practices produce gender inequality, 'these practices become potential targets for experimentation and change' (Meyerson & Kolb, 2000, p. 564).…”

“…This article aims to explore what gender knowledge participants need to understand, engage in and/or support transformational change towards gender equality. It contributes to the literature on gender equality interventions (Benschop & Van den Brink, 2014;Bird, 2011;Bleijenbergh & Van Engen, 2015;Britton & Logan, 2008;Bustelo et al, 2016) by coining the concept of systemic gender knowledge and detailing two characteristics of this knowledge, by developing an analytical tool to explore this systemic gender knowledge and by using this tool to explore the systemic gender knowledge of participants to two gender equality interventions. To this end, we first need to conceptualize what gender knowledge supports transformational change.…”