2018
DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2018-0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic

Abstract: Community participation has entered the 21st century and the era of e-participation, e-government and e-planning. With the opportunity to use Public Participation Support Systems, Computer-Aided Web Interviews and crowdsourcing mapping platforms, citizens are equipped with the tools to have their voices heard. This paper presents a case study of the deployment of such an online mapping platform in Jeseník, Czech Republic. In total, 533 respondents took part in the online mapping survey, which included six spat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the commercial providers are not mapping the world of the Global South enough, it is the responsibility of local users to create their own maps, to bridge the gap between cartography and reality and to engage actively in the phenomena of neocartography (Cartwright, 2012;Pánek, 2011). The role of IT is not only to provide ultimately smaller and faster chips, smartphones and internet lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the commercial providers are not mapping the world of the Global South enough, it is the responsibility of local users to create their own maps, to bridge the gap between cartography and reality and to engage actively in the phenomena of neocartography (Cartwright, 2012;Pánek, 2011). The role of IT is not only to provide ultimately smaller and faster chips, smartphones and internet lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participant sampling was based on three criteria: 1) they had to live in the village chosen for this study; 2) they had to have a residence time of more than 35 years (so that they had the experience in agriculture appropriate for the periods covered by the study); and 3) their work activity had to be related to agriculture (Brown and Kyttä 2018;Pánek 2018;McCall 2021). Regarding the rst criteria, contact was made with a relevant facilitator (in terms of community recognition)-namely, the president of the neighbourhood council-who enabled the initial selection of participants that t the criteria.…”
Section: Preliminary Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participant sampling was based on three criteria: 1) they had to live in the village chosen for this study; 2) they had to have a residence time of more than 35 years (so that they had the experience in agriculture appropriate for the periods covered by the study); and 3) their work activity had to be related to agriculture (Brown and Kyttä 2018;Pánek 2018;McCall 2021). Regarding the rst criteria, contact was made with a relevant facilitator (in terms of community recognition)-namely, the president of the neighbourhood council-who enabled the initial selection of participants that t the criteria.…”
Section: Preliminary Workmentioning
confidence: 99%