Participatory Guarantee Systems: Alternative Ways of Defining, Measuring, and Assessing ‘Sustainability’

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, standards and certification have become the leading governance mechanism for determining what sustainability entails, how to measure it, and how to assess it. This system of sustainability standards has generally relied upon the third‐party certification (TPC) model to ensure that producers are complying with standards. Over the past ten to fifteen years, critiques of this model have emerged in both practitioner and academic circles that question the appropriateness of this model based on the type of knowledge that is privileged, the marginalisation of some actors, and the allocation of accountability to individual rather than collective actors. We draw upon case studies from Japan and Chile to examine the ways that participatory guarantee systems (PGS) institute practices for defining, measuring, and assessing sustainability that empower local actors – both producers and consumers. Our cases illustrate that expert and lay knowledges are both relevant and often have different strengths. We argue that PGS offer an alternative approach to sustainability governance, one that may be more democratic and hence, produce forms of sustainability that incorporate the lived experiences of people around the world.

Sustainable Food Supply Chains: Is Shortening the Answer? A Literature Review for a Research and Innovation Agenda

“…Recent papers explored the development of "prosumption" in SFSCs, i.e., the implication of consumers in productive tasks [140]. Another new research direction has focused on the extension of participatory guarantee systems, usually studied in the realm of organic farming [141], to SFSCs and local food systems [112,142]. This orientation reaffirms the role of civil society in developing new forms of agrifood governance [143], a phenomenon first observed in CSA initiatives and equivalent systems.…”

Life cycle assessment calculative practices in the Swedish biofuel sector: Governing biofuel sustainability by standards and numbers

“…Standards have become the primary governance mechanisms for determining “what sustainability entails,” “how to measure it,” and “how to assess it” (Loconto, ). Standards prioritize certain information into metrics and indicators and by doing so leave other forms of knowledge out.…”

Building a Knowledge Commons: Evidence from the Participatory Guarantee System for an Agroecology Label in Morocco

“…Scholarly or academic expertise were not included. Loconto and Hatanaka (2018) show that the PGS mechanism favours farmers' knowledge, which is based on indigenous and acquired agroecological knowledge, rather than independent expert knowledge. This posture is criticized by some Moroccan stakeholders, who consider that the PGS community has little genuine agroecological knowledge.…”