Participatory Action Research with High-risk Groups: Best Practice for Researchers' Safety and Data Integrity

Eynde, Julie van den; Veno, Arthur

doi:10.1080/10345329.2013.12035976

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A number of PAR studies have also examined the link between educational and health outcomes by examining questions related to children’s and students’ rights, public health issues, and other social-political concerns (Brydon-Miller & Maguire, 2009; Lewis, 2001; McIntyre, 2000). Although relatively fewer in comparison, there are some examples of PAR work conducted with criminalized populations (Brown, 2010; Bryant & Payne, 2013; Frank, Omstead, & Pigg, 2012; Long Incarcerated Fraternity Engaging Release Studies [LIFERS], 2004; Marquez-Lewis et al, 2013; Mishne, Warner, Willis, & Shomaker, 2012; Payne & Brown, 2016; Piché, Gaugher, & Walby, 2014; Price, 2008; Shomaker, Willis, & Bryant, 2014; Torre & Fine, 2005; Van den Eynde & Veno, 2013).…”

Section: Street Par and Sites Of Resilience (Sor) Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Challenges With Conducting Street Par In Prisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Van den Eynde and Veno (2013) drew attention to the methodological concerns of emotional safety for ethnographers involved in research projects with criminalized populations. Outlaw Motorcycle Clubs’s (OMC) PAR project created an inside–outside team built on “complementary dissimilarity” to mitigate the emotional costs the insider faced conducting intense fieldwork (Van den Eynde & Veno, 2013). Reiter’s (2014) work on supermax prisons in California demonstrates how even with cross-disciplinary and institutional-networked approaches, scholars must also document the emotional challenges (as data) they face when negotiating institutional collaborations and the likelihood the research itself could contribute to unintended policy consequences.…”

Section: Challenges With Conducting Street Par In Prisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Street Participatory Action Research in Prison: A Methodology to Challenge Privilege and Power in Correctional Facilities

Payne

Bryant

2018

The Prison Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a prison research model grounded in street participatory action research (Street PAR) methodology but programmatically facilitated in an Inside-Out Prison Exchange Program class. Street PAR's nine tenets were adapted to a prison setting, and we demonstrate its promise with a brief case study of research projects at one prison location. This article also explores the challenges scholars and incarcerated persons as researchers may face in correctional facilities. Street PAR and Inside-Out can improve prison environments and successful transition to local communities as a function of equipping incarcerated persons with reading, writing, and analytic skill sets.

show abstract