2005
DOI: 10.2190/u0f6-h37l-ww59-lmt4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory Action Research: A Protective Research Design

Abstract: This commentary briefly reviews the ethical considerations for protection of workers participating in research. We argue that many IRBs may not fully understand the nature of collaborative and participatory research methods; consequently, this may delay IRB approval or worse, reduce the effectiveness of IRB oversight. A U.S. workplace participatory action research (PAR) project with which we are involved illustrates how researcher-worker-employer teams can navigate human subject oversight procedures (IRB appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protection of the privacy of research participants takes on added dimensions within the context of both occupational health and community-based research ( McPhaul and Lipscomb 2005 ). The planning, early participatory training, and ongoing conduct of the work have all revolved around maintaining privacy of participants, and the community staff are sensitive to these issues.…”
Section: Challenges Of Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protection of the privacy of research participants takes on added dimensions within the context of both occupational health and community-based research ( McPhaul and Lipscomb 2005 ). The planning, early participatory training, and ongoing conduct of the work have all revolved around maintaining privacy of participants, and the community staff are sensitive to these issues.…”
Section: Challenges Of Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%