Participative mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Pedra Branca State Park, Brazil

Ribeiro, Fernando P.; Ribeiro, Kátia Torres

doi:10.1016/j.ncon.2016.09.004

Cited by 31 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, GIS based mapping (e.g. Ives et al, 2017;Zwierzchowska et al, 2018;Ribeiro et al, 2016;Upton et al, 2015), participatory mapping (Brown et al, 2016;Van Berkel et al, 2014;Rall et al, 2018), field observations, and expert-based scoring (Dou et al, 2017;Cooper et al, 2016;Stålhammar et al, 2017). Most of these assessment methods were GIS-based, including GIS tools developed appositely for the purpose.…”

Section: Ces Evaluation Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

RETRACTED: Mapping Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Review and Relevance to Urban Context

Abualhagag

Valánszki

2020

Journal of Landscape Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over decades human well-being has recognized from ecosystems, not only through material goods but also through nonmaterial assets namely cultural ecosystem services (CES). Regardless of increasing Ecosystem Services (ES) research over the last decade, cultural services assessment still remains neglected and is mainly limited to marketable services such as recreation and ecotourism. Obvious challenges in standardizing definitions and measurement units have brought about numerous difficulties in accounting cultural services and specific related indicators in decision-making processes. In that regard, the current review intends to create a reference list of CES categories and related measurement units with commonly used indicators. To put it another way, we analysis 80 publications to identify the most common CES indicators using in mapping various categories of CES approaches. Results prove that there are various methods can be used in assessing CES categories, whereas we found 57 indicators can be used for that and most of these indicators can be utilized in urban planning context as spatial indicators. Moreover, it is obvious that almost the same indicators can be used in evaluating most CES categories. For instance, in case of recreation and tourism indicators almost 50 % of all collected indicators can be used for mapping it, on the contrary, in case of spiritual and religious values. In conclusion, while there are various mapping methods of CES and different indicators, most of CES categories have relatively ignored by the planner and decision-makers such as education and inspirational values. Therefore, we recommend the use of the collected indicators and relevant measurement units in assessing neglected values in future research.

show abstract

Section: Ces Evaluation Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

RETRACTED: Mapping Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Review and Relevance to Urban Context

Abualhagag

Valánszki

2020

Journal of Landscape Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The research found few studies that evaluated people's perception of ES and the relationship they have with their environment (Mathé and Rey-Valette, 2015;Oliveira and Berkes, 2014) and with ecological restoration projects (Brancalion et al, 2014). The studies apply qualitative (Pereira and Campos, 2009;Ribeiro and Ribeiro, 2016;Souza Filho et al, 2014) and quantitative evaluations (Mariano et al, 2015;Rares and Brandimarte, 2014) and economic valuation of ES (Mathé and Rey-Valette, 2015), to point out that aesthetic values and opportunities for recreation and tourism are the most commonly perceived ES.…”

Section: Cultural Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on ecosystem services in Brazil: a systematic review

Parron¹,

Fidalgo²,

Luz³

et al. 2019

Rev. ambiente água

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies using the ‘ecosystem services’ (ES) approach developed in Brazil based on the framework of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), and range from quantitative and qualitative evaluation to the development of economic instruments for payment for ecosystem services (PES) or compensation for their maintenance, mainly for hydrological services. In order to summarize current knowledge regarding ES, the structure for teaching in ES, and also to provide a basis for future research in Brazil, we carried out a systematic review of publications on ES and a study on the availability of undergraduate and graduate courses related to ES. We found 282 publications for the 2006-2017 period, which included peer-reviewed articles, books, book chapters, theses, dissertations, articles in annals and technical publications. We identified current knowledge, knowledge gaps and trends in ES researches that may guide surveys and scenario analyses for future studies, in different biomes and regions of the country. Atlantic Forest and Amazon are the most-studied biome. Most of the studies were related to the evaluation of different types of ES and to the development of methodologies for their evaluation and monitoring. The most common ES are related to biodiversity, carbon sequestration and water.

show abstract

“…These methods offer an alternative to self-reporting surveys, activity logs, and direct observation methods such as SOPARC (McKenzie, 2005) for identifying the public health benefits from park activities . Further, these participatory mapping methods have the flexibility to identify broader social values and cultural ecosystem services associated with urban greenspaces (Tyrväinen et al, 2007;Ives et al, 2017;Rall et al, 2017;Ribeiro and Ribeiro, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits

Brown

Rhodes

Dade

2018

Landscape and Urban Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional urban park research has used self-reported surveys and activity logs to examine relationships between health benefits, park use, and park features. An alternative approach uses participating mapping methods. This study sought to validate and expand on previous participatory mapping research methods and findings and address spatial scaling by applying these methods to a large urban park system. Key challenges for spatial scaling included ambiguity in park classification and achieving representative sampling for larger and spatially-disbursed urban residents. We designed an internet-based public participation GIS (PPGIS) survey and used household and volunteer sampling to identify the type and locations of urban park benefits. Study participants (n=816) identified locations of physical activities and other urban park benefits (psychological, social, and environmental) which were analyzed by park type. Consistent with previous suburb-scale research, we found significant associations between urban park type and different urban park benefits. Linear parks were significantly associated with higher intensity physical activities; natural parks were associated with environmental benefits; and community parks were associated with benefits from social interaction. Neighborhood parks emerged as significantly associated with psychological benefits. The diversity of park activities and benefits were positively correlated with park size. Distance analysis confirmed that physical benefits of parks were closest to participant domicile, while social and environmental benefits were more distant. These results validate previous suburb-scale findings despite greater variability in park types and sample populations. Future urban park research using participatory mapping would benefit from greater effort to obtain participation from under-represented populations that can induce nonresponse bias, and analyses to determine whether system-wide results can be disaggregated by suburb or neighborhood to address social inequities in urban park benefits.

show abstract

Participative mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Pedra Branca State Park, Brazil

Cited by 31 publications

References 12 publications

RETRACTED: Mapping Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Review and Relevance to Urban Context

RETRACTED: Mapping Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Review and Relevance to Urban Context

Research on ecosystem services in Brazil: a systematic review

An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About