2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11115-007-0043-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation in Decentralized Local Governance: Two Contrasting Cases from the Philippines

Abstract: Decentralization, Local governance, Participation, Pro-poor policy, Development aid, The Philippines,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two interest groups are key players in the community as agents of policy implementation with their own resources. Communications with both new and traditional stakeholders enable local governments to increase policy efficiency with more input, and to mobilize more resources to implement policies (Berenschot, 2016;Ishii et al, 2007;Legaspi, 2010).…”
Section: Communication With Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two interest groups are key players in the community as agents of policy implementation with their own resources. Communications with both new and traditional stakeholders enable local governments to increase policy efficiency with more input, and to mobilize more resources to implement policies (Berenschot, 2016;Ishii et al, 2007;Legaspi, 2010).…”
Section: Communication With Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An essential component of good governance is the ability to enable citizens to express their views, and to act on those views, facilitated through participation [48]; the more deliberate the process, the more reflexive governance is [3]. When in-depth information is not disseminated to citizens, participatory and deliberation mechanisms may be ineffective [49]. Formal participatory assemblies may sometimes be geared towards 'domesticating' and undermining the legitimacy of groups who choose to engage critically with local governments (and industry).…”
Section: Reflexive Governance Participation and Deliberative Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there exist a plethora of studies examining the impacts of decentralization in the country, most of them concluded that its promise and potential have not been fully realized due to elite capture, lack of accountability mechanisms and patronage politics (cf. Ishii, Hossain and Rees, 2007;Yilmaz and Venugopal, 2013;Shair-Rosenfield, 2016). Others however argued that compared to other Asian countries, the decentralization program of the country "has attained better performance" (Guess, 2005, p. 217) and local governments have become "more innovative, experimental and enterprising under decentralization" (Capuno, 2011, p. 65).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%