2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
62
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This research will focus on comments in order to examine what motivates their content, what sentiment they reflect (polarity and subjectivity), and how YouTubers make use of this interaction. Dynel (2014) identifies three different levels of communication on YouTuber channels: The level of the speaker and hearer in the video interaction; the level of the sender and recipient of a YT video; and the level of speakers and hearers who post and read comments, respectively. Participating in all these levels is not only the YouTuber but also the members of the YouTuber's production team and the hearers themselves, who are able to comment, reply, or post their own videos.…”
Section: Youtube: Broadcast Yourselfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research will focus on comments in order to examine what motivates their content, what sentiment they reflect (polarity and subjectivity), and how YouTubers make use of this interaction. Dynel (2014) identifies three different levels of communication on YouTuber channels: The level of the speaker and hearer in the video interaction; the level of the sender and recipient of a YT video; and the level of speakers and hearers who post and read comments, respectively. Participating in all these levels is not only the YouTuber but also the members of the YouTuber's production team and the hearers themselves, who are able to comment, reply, or post their own videos.…”
Section: Youtube: Broadcast Yourselfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La fuerte conexión de los youtubers con su audiencia, que puede considerarse incluso como una fanaticada, se ve interrumpida por las publicidades y el marketing que se implantan en los canales (Dynel, 2014). Las empresas están en constante búsqueda de canales 1:: Ese video contaba, a la fecha de realizado este artículo, con más de cuatro millones de reproducciones.…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified
“…an interaction "that occurs when persons gather close together and openly cooperate to sustain a single focus of attention, typically by taking turns, " while really being in live mode for another media company. The web context with multiple cameras and lives modes thus constructs a complex participatory framework allowing for "multi-party interaction" (Dynel 2014). Here, the Expressen reporter treats himself (and his audience) as self-evident ratified listeners (whom are not addressed but are entitled to listen in on the other interview), whilst from the politician's point of view, possibly, the journalist occupies the role of unratified listener (someone whom the speaker does not want to communicate any meanings to) (ibid; Bell 1984;Goffman 1981).…”
Section: Example 1: Prioritizing Live: Expressen's Filming Of Sthlm Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the video, however, this is communicative project is not fronted. Dynel (2014) develops a framework of interaction for the communicative activities and participatory roles YouTube affords. YouTubers as "recipients, " are, apart from (1) interacting in videos themselves as hearers/listeners, conceptualized as (2) recipents watching videos, and (3) addressees and non-addressed ratified listeners (third parties) who read each others comments.…”
Section: Example 2: Re-framing the Web Tv Interviews -The Panda Youtumentioning
confidence: 99%