2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01579-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses

Abstract: While volunteer-based studies such as the UK Biobank have become the cornerstone of genetic epidemiology, the participating individuals are rarely representative of their target population. To evaluate the impact of selective participation, here we derived UK Biobank participation probabilities on the basis of 14 variables harmonized across the UK Biobank and a representative sample. We then conducted weighted genome-wide association analyses on 19 traits. Comparing the output from weighted genome-wide associa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one potential limitation of this approach is that it does not produce SNP effect sizes on a similar scale to case-control studies, which creates challenges in the interpretation and some applications requiring effect sizes. While weighted least squares is a common approach to account for non-random study participation (32), it did not give promising results in our analysis. Excluding individuals who do not know about parental health from the analysis and residualizing GWAX on genetic associations with parental health awareness both reduced the spurious AD-EA genetic correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, one potential limitation of this approach is that it does not produce SNP effect sizes on a similar scale to case-control studies, which creates challenges in the interpretation and some applications requiring effect sizes. While weighted least squares is a common approach to account for non-random study participation (32), it did not give promising results in our analysis. Excluding individuals who do not know about parental health from the analysis and residualizing GWAX on genetic associations with parental health awareness both reduced the spurious AD-EA genetic correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The Jansen approach yielded a significant but positive genetic correlation with coronary artery disease (cor = 0.14, p = 1.5E-6). To reduce participation bias, we followed Schoeler et al (32) and conducted a weighted GWAS on parental AD status. We trained a LASSO regression model on whether a survey participant reported parental illnesses using a random subset of UKB samples and then performed weighted GWAS on the remaining samples (Methods).…”
Section: Reducing Biases In Gwaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, information bias could be present due to undiagnosed or unreported cases of schizophrenia and other self-reported health-related covariates. Fourth, potential participation bias should be acknowledged, as our sample was slightly biased towards individuals with higher socio-economic status, similar to other genetic studies (Schoeler et al, 2023). Extrapolation to younger populations should be made cautiously.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, this manuscript is not without limitations. First, this is a cross-sectional study in a European ancestry subsample of individuals whose caregivers volunteered to participate in the research study (Schoeler et al, 2023). This limits study generalizability, which may be especially important for better understanding potential relationships between facets of academic achievement and factors related to health and well being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%