Participation and Pedagogy: Connecting the Social Web to ACRL Learning Outcomes

Bobish, Greg

doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2010.10.007

Cited by 34 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While the use of Web 2.0 for information literacy instruction is a relatively new area of study, previous research found that these technologies had the potential to help students improve their information literacy competency (Bobish, 2011;Bussert, Brown, & Armstrong, 2008;Chan & Cmor, 2009;Deitering, 2008;Godwin, 2009). Bobish (2011) examined the connection between ACRL IL standards and Web 2.0 as a tool for supporting various learning outcomes listed within the standards that relate to constructivist pedagogy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Bobish (2011) examined the connection between ACRL IL standards and Web 2.0 as a tool for supporting various learning outcomes listed within the standards that relate to constructivist pedagogy. This study supports Bobish's conclusion by providing empirical data which indicates that Web 2.0 tools enhance student learning related to ACRL IL standards.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While Web 2.0 was not yet a term when the standards were first written, Bobish (2011) examined the connection between ACRL learning outcomes and the pedagogical potential of various Web 2.0 tools through a constructivist lens. For example under Standard Two, one of the outcomes is "Investigates the scope, content, and organization of information retrieval systems" (ARCL, 2000, p. 9).…”

Section: Acrl Information Literacy Standards and Web 20mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Web 2.0 and Information Literacy Instruction: Aligning Technology with ACRL Standards

Magnuson

2013

The Journal of Academic Librarianship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Acrl Information Literacy Standards and Web 20mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Web 2.0 and Information Literacy Instruction: Aligning Technology with ACRL Standards

Magnuson

2013

The Journal of Academic Librarianship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Examples include a literature review on the changing role of academic librarians (Shupe & Pung, 2011), a position paper on connecting the social Web to ACRL learning outcomes (Bobish, 2011), and an essay comparing Elsevier Compendex and Google Scholar as resources for engineering research (Cusker, 2013).…”

Section: 1mentioning

confidence: 99%

JAL in the Past Decade: A Comprehensive Analysis of Academic Library Research

McKinney

2015

The Journal of Academic Librarianship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:A content analysis is conducted to examine the peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal of Academic Librarianship (JAL) from 2004 to 2013. Five key variables are studied: authorship, article type, topic, research methods/design, and research theories/models. About three-fourths of the articles were authored by at least one librarian, and over half of the articles were co-authored. More than two-thirds of the articles were primary research articles, and a total of 24 topics related to academic libraries were covered, among which information literacy was the most popular one. Survey and content analysis are the two most frequently used research methods in the articles. This study, capturing the topical and methodological substance of academic library research, will generate ideas for providing effective research training/education for academic librarians and contribute to the enhancement of research culture and research practice among them.

show abstract

“…However, by using metaliteracy to reimagine information literacy, the new Framework expresses the content and concepts many librarians have already been teaching in the classroom (Bobish, 2010;Luo, 2009;Magnuson, 2013;Garcia, Walstrum, and Morrison, 2011) to adapt to the impact of technology on the information environment, such as the use and evaluation of Web 2.0 technology as ways to find and create information.…”

Section: The New Framework: Metaliteracy and Threshold Conceptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying the Framework for Information Literacy to the Developmental Education Classroom

Garcia

2014

Community & Junior College Libraries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Translating the new Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education(ACRL, November 2014) into learning outcomes, instructional content, and assessments might appear to be an overwhelming task; however, in many cases the revision exemplifies how many librarians have been teaching information literacy in the digital information landscape. This article describes the collaboration between a librarian and an instructor to integrate information literacy into a developmental reading class before the revision of information literacy standards were available and provides an example of adapting the new Framework to library sessions that already reflect a transformation in information literacy instruction for developmental education.

show abstract

Participation and Pedagogy: Connecting the Social Web to ACRL Learning Outcomes

Cited by 34 publications

References 8 publications

Web 2.0 and Information Literacy Instruction: Aligning Technology with ACRL Standards

Web 2.0 and Information Literacy Instruction: Aligning Technology with ACRL Standards

JAL in the Past Decade: A Comprehensive Analysis of Academic Library Research

Applying the Framework for Information Literacy to the Developmental Education Classroom

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About