2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022je007398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partially‐Saturated Brines Within Basal Ice or Sediments Can Explain the Bright Basal Reflections in the South Polar Layered Deposits

Abstract: The Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionospheric Sounding (MARSIS) instrument on Mars Express has detected strong subsurface radar reflections in the region of Ultimi Scopuli (81°S, 193°E), within the South Polar Layered Deposits (SPLD) (Lauro et al., 2021;Orosei et al., 2018). These subsurface reflections are ∼10 dB greater in power than the surrounding reflections and ∼3 dB greater than the reflections from the surface (Orosei et al., 2018). The reflectors are located at the base of the SPLD, approxima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smith et al. (2021), however, reported anomalously large complex dielectric permittivity values for a smectite sample, mixed with a large amount of water, at ∼230 K. Because those values contrast significantly with the results reported at MARSIS frequency by other authors (e.g., Stillman et al., 2022), we replicated Smith et al.’s (2021) experiments in an effort to understand the origin of such discrepancy. We used the same type of clay (STx‐1b) and followed the same general approach described by those authors, running experiments over the frequency interval 1–100 MHz and at temperatures between 200 and 290 K. The experimental setup was designed to accurately control the temperature ramping and to monitor the temperature inside and outside the clay sample.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Smith et al. (2021), however, reported anomalously large complex dielectric permittivity values for a smectite sample, mixed with a large amount of water, at ∼230 K. Because those values contrast significantly with the results reported at MARSIS frequency by other authors (e.g., Stillman et al., 2022), we replicated Smith et al.’s (2021) experiments in an effort to understand the origin of such discrepancy. We used the same type of clay (STx‐1b) and followed the same general approach described by those authors, running experiments over the frequency interval 1–100 MHz and at temperatures between 200 and 290 K. The experimental setup was designed to accurately control the temperature ramping and to monitor the temperature inside and outside the clay sample.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Recently, Mattei et al (2022) reviewed the literature relevant to the dielectric behavior of clays at very low temperature (around 200 K), highlighting that neither theoretical nor experimental data support the hypothesis that frozen clays have a large complex dielectric permittivity consistent with the subglacial basal reflections detected by MARSIS at Ultimi Scopuli. Smith et al (2021), however, reported anomalously large complex dielectric permittivity values for a smectite sample, mixed with a large amount of water, at ∼230 K. Because those values contrast significantly with the results reported at MARSIS frequency by other authors (e.g., Stillman et al, 2022), we replicated Smith et al's (2021) experiments in an effort to understand the origin of such discrepancy. We used the same type of clay (STx-1b) and followed the same general approach described by those authors, running experiments over the frequency interval 1-100 MHz and at temperatures between 200 and 290 K. The experimental setup was designed to accurately control the temperature ramping and to monitor the temperature inside and outside the clay sample.…”
Section: Plain Language Summarymentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Conversely, ɛ 2′ < ɛ 2 could lower the inverted basal permittivity toward materials more compatible with dry mixture of conductive materials (Bierson et al., 2021; I. B. Smith et al., 2021; Stillman et al., 2022; Stillman & Olhoeft, 2008; Tulaczyk & Foley, 2020). The thickness of the slab is also of importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if the slab is assumed to be 5-m thick, as suggested by the excavation depth 160 km away reported by M. E. Landis and Whitten (2022), then the derived basal permittivity for 2 < ε′ 2 < 4.1 could range approximately anywhere between 20 and 60, possibly approaching on its low-end dry mixtures of conductive minerals (Bierson et al, 2021;I. B. Smith et al, 2021;Stillman et al, 2022;Stillman & Olhoeft, 2008;Tulaczyk & Foley, 2020;). This range would change for a different slab thickness, reaching lower basal permittivities for a thicker slab.…”
Section: Geophysical Research Lettersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative materials such as clays, metal‐bearing minerals, volcanic‐related materials, or saline ice have been suggested as a possible explanation for the bright basal reflections (Bierson et al., 2021; Grima et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2021). However, recent studies have shown that these materials lack the necessary high dielectric permittivity to generate strong radar reflections at the temperatures hypothesized for the base of the SPLD (Mattei et al., 2022; Stillman et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%