Abstract:Coherent π+ and π • production in low energy neutrino reactions is discussed in the framework of the partially conserved axial vector current theory (PCAC). The role of lepton mass effects in suppressing the π + production is emphasized. Instead of using models of pion nucleus scattering, the available data on pion Carbon scattering are implemented for an analysis of the PCAC prediction. Our results agree well with the published upper limits for π + production but are much below the recent MiniBooNE result for… Show more
“…Based on previous measurements of CC coherent π + production [42], they conclude that σ(CCcohπ + ) σ(NCcohπ 0 ) SciBooNE = 0.14 +0.30 −0.28 . This result can not be accommodated within our model, or any other present theoretical model, neither microscopic [9][10][11]13] nor PCAC based [1,2,43,44]. Theoretically, this ratio cannot be much smaller than 1.4-1.6.…”
As a result of a new improved fit to old bubble chamber data of the dominant axial C A 5 nucleonto-Delta form factor, and due to the relevance of this form factor for neutrino induced coherent pion production, we re-evaluate our model predictions in Phys. Rev. D 79, 013002 (2009) for different observables of the latter reaction. Central values for the total cross sections increase by 20%∼30%, while differential cross sections do not change their shape appreciably. Furthermore, we also compute the uncertainties on total, differential and flux averaged cross sections induced by the errors in the determination of C A 5 . Our new results turn out to be compatible within about 1σ with the former ones. Finally, we stress the existing tension between the recent experimental determination of the σ(CCcohπ + ) σ(NCcohπ 0 ) ratio by the SciBooNE Collaboration and the theoretical predictions.
“…Based on previous measurements of CC coherent π + production [42], they conclude that σ(CCcohπ + ) σ(NCcohπ 0 ) SciBooNE = 0.14 +0.30 −0.28 . This result can not be accommodated within our model, or any other present theoretical model, neither microscopic [9][10][11]13] nor PCAC based [1,2,43,44]. Theoretically, this ratio cannot be much smaller than 1.4-1.6.…”
As a result of a new improved fit to old bubble chamber data of the dominant axial C A 5 nucleonto-Delta form factor, and due to the relevance of this form factor for neutrino induced coherent pion production, we re-evaluate our model predictions in Phys. Rev. D 79, 013002 (2009) for different observables of the latter reaction. Central values for the total cross sections increase by 20%∼30%, while differential cross sections do not change their shape appreciably. Furthermore, we also compute the uncertainties on total, differential and flux averaged cross sections induced by the errors in the determination of C A 5 . Our new results turn out to be compatible within about 1σ with the former ones. Finally, we stress the existing tension between the recent experimental determination of the σ(CCcohπ + ) σ(NCcohπ 0 ) ratio by the SciBooNE Collaboration and the theoretical predictions.
“…By its nature, coherent scattering involves a very small fourmomentum transfer to the target nucleus and so its contribution is confined to very low Q 2 . Different models are commonly used; while NEUT and GENIE use different implementations of the Rein-Sehgal [31] model, NuWro uses the Berger-Sehgal [48] model. NEUT predicts a distinctly larger rate for coherent reaction (9) than does GENIE.…”
Cross sections for ν_{μ} and ν[over ¯]_{μ} induced pion production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA
FERMILAB-PUB-16-228-NDCross sections for ν µ andν µ induced pion production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA Separate samples of charged-current pion production events representing two semi-inclusive channels νµ-CC(π + ) andνµ-CC(π 0 ) have been obtained using neutrino and antineutrino exposures of the MINERvA detector. Distributions in kinematic variables based upon µ ± -track reconstructions are analyzed and compared for the two samples. The differential cross sections for muon production angle, muon momentum, and four-momentum transfer Q 2 , are reported, and cross sections versus neutrino energy are obtained. Comparisons with predictions of current neutrino event generators are used to clarify the role of the ∆(1232) and higher-mass baryon resonances in CC pion production and to show the importance of pion final-state interactions. For the νµ-CC(π + ) (νµ-CC(π 0 )) sample, the absolute data rate is observed to lie below (above) the predictions of some of the event generators by amounts that are typically 1-to-2 σ. However the generators are able to reproduce the shapes of the differential cross sections for all kinematic variables of either data set.
“…These authors utilize an improved description of the pion-nucleus interaction [44]. At low energies, elastic scattering is parameterized by partial waves.…”
Abstract. One session at the NUINT09 conference was devoted to talks at the interface of theory and experiment. A highlight of that session was a presentation comparing results of many theorists and modelers. This note briefly describes the models and compares calculations of important neutrino-nucleus cross sections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.