1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.82.2661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partially Coherent Solitons on a Finite Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
238
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
238
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Physically, the solution (Φ, ψ) denotes the two-component beam in Kerr-like photorefractive media(cf. [1]). The positive constant µ j is for self-focusing in the j-th component of the beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physically, the solution (Φ, ψ) denotes the two-component beam in Kerr-like photorefractive media(cf. [1]). The positive constant µ j is for self-focusing in the j-th component of the beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that one can obtain from Liouville-type theorems a variety of results on qualitative properties of solutions such as: universal, pointwise, a priori estimates of local solutions; universal and singularity estimates; decay estimates; universal bound of global solutions, initial and final blow-up rates, etc..., see [24,25] and references therein. In addition, it was shown in [34] that the parabolic system (1) can be used in the study of solutions of the corresponding elliptic problems, provided one can show suitable a priori bound of the global solutions of (1). This a priori bound property is a consequence of the Liouville-type theorems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, for any R > 0, we rescale Finally, to treat the general case, we recall that the Liouville-type property of Theorem 2.1 for bounded solutions is sufficient for the proof of Proposition 3.1 (see the paragraph after Proposition 3.1). But after a time shift, formula (13) in Proposition 3.1 guarantees that any solution of (1) in R N × (−T, T ) has to satisfy u(x, t) ≤ CT −1/(p−1) in R N × (−T /2, T /2). The conclusion then follows by letting T → ∞.…”
Section: Using (23) Again and Integrating By Parts In T We Obtain (18)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations