2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcc.2014.2372753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Utility-Driven Scheduling for Flexible SLA and Pricing Arbitration in Clouds

Abstract: Cloud SLAs compensate customers with credits when average availability drops below certain levels. This is too inflexible because consumers lose non-measurable amounts of performance being only compensated later, in next charging cycles. We propose to schedule virtual machines (VMs), driven by range-based non-linear reductions of utility, different for classes of users and across different ranges of resource allocations: partial utility. This customer-defined metric, allows providers transferring resources bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It suggested the three possible mechanisms towards cloud resource procurement: cloud-Bayesian incentive compatible (C-BIC), cloud-dominant strategy incentive compatible (C-DSIC), and cloud optimal (C-OPT). In [18] suggested specific schedule virtual machines (VMs) that were driven by the fact of range-based non-linear reductions towards the utility These are specific to every user and across several ranges in the allocation of resources like a partial utility. The work also defined an inclusive cost model that incorporated partial utility provided by clients towards a certain level of degradation during the overcommitted moment of VMs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suggested the three possible mechanisms towards cloud resource procurement: cloud-Bayesian incentive compatible (C-BIC), cloud-dominant strategy incentive compatible (C-DSIC), and cloud optimal (C-OPT). In [18] suggested specific schedule virtual machines (VMs) that were driven by the fact of range-based non-linear reductions towards the utility These are specific to every user and across several ranges in the allocation of resources like a partial utility. The work also defined an inclusive cost model that incorporated partial utility provided by clients towards a certain level of degradation during the overcommitted moment of VMs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there are several techniques that try to allocate a DAG to the appropriate number of resources, but, typically, they do not consider any aspect that can correspond to repartitioning overhead, e.g., [21], [22]. Bi-objective allocation in cloud settings have been considered in several other works, but making different assumptions, e.g., when clients are potentially antagonistic to the provider and jobs consist of standalone tasks as in [23], or when there are multiple candidate cloud infrastructures, as in [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overcommitting and service level agreement (SLA) QoS violations are two common problems of NE allocation during peak demands [3]. Overcommitting refers to the situation where InP accepts new VNO requests, even though the available NEs are not sufficient to satisfy them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%