1993
DOI: 10.1104/pp.101.1.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Sequence Analysis of 130 Randomly Selected Maize cDNA Clones

Abstract: As part of a project to identify nove1 maize (Zea mays 1. cv B73) genes functionally, we have partially sequenced 130 randomly selected clones from a maize leaf cDNA library. Data base comparisons revealed seven previously sequenced maize cDNAs and 18 cDNAs with sequence similarity to related maize genes or to genes from other organisms. One hundred five cDNAs show little or no similarity to previously sequenced genes. Our results also establish the suitability of this library for large-scale sequencing in ter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 628 cDNA clones, 184 showed significant sequence similarity to known nucleotide sequences in the databases, and 142 clones shared significant nucleotide sequence identity with plant ESTs previously reported from Arabidopsis (Hofte et al, 1993;Newman et al, 1994), maize (Keith et al, 1993), and rice (Uchimiya et al, 1992;Sasaki et al, 1994). To examine the significance of this finding, we again compared the Brassica cDNAs and the matching EST at the amino acid level using the TFASTA program.…”
Section: Characterization Of Estsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the 628 cDNA clones, 184 showed significant sequence similarity to known nucleotide sequences in the databases, and 142 clones shared significant nucleotide sequence identity with plant ESTs previously reported from Arabidopsis (Hofte et al, 1993;Newman et al, 1994), maize (Keith et al, 1993), and rice (Uchimiya et al, 1992;Sasaki et al, 1994). To examine the significance of this finding, we again compared the Brassica cDNAs and the matching EST at the amino acid level using the TFASTA program.…”
Section: Characterization Of Estsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Various other organisms, such as nematode (McCombie et al, 1992; * Corresponding author; e-mail mjcho@nongae.gsr,w.ac.kr; fax 82-591-759-9363. Waterston et al, 1992), mouse (Hoog, 1991), and severa1 plants (Uchimiya et al, 1992;Hofte et al, 1993;Keith et al, 1993;Park et al, 1993;Newman et al, 1994;Sasaki et al, 1994) have also been examined by extensive sequencing of randomly selected cDNA clones. The enormous accumulation of ESTs has thus led to the establishment of dbEST (Boguski et al, 1993(Boguski et al, , 1994.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, an approach has been taken to construct equalized cDNA library for the isolation of cDNA clones of low abundance (Kohchi et al, 1995, Kohchi, 1997 Conversely, by selecting strong signal clones, it is easy to obtain sequence information of abundant cDNA clones. Previous studies in the plant random sequencing project revealed that the cDNA clones encoding putative ribosomal proteins were dominant among cDNA libraries and more than 20% of the clones identified in those works were classified into a group of genes functioning in translation processes (Uchimiya et al, 1992, Keith et al, 1993, Hofte et al,1993, Newman et al, 1994, Sasaki et al,1994, Hihara et al, 1997. As summarized in Table 1, cDNA clones identified in this study exhibited homology to a broad spectrum of genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Recently, a large number of cDNA clones were identified by random sequencing from plants including maize (Keith et al, 1993), Arabidopsis thaliana (Hofte et al, 1993;Newman et al, 1994), Brassica napes (Park et al, 1993) and rice (Uchimiya et al,1992;Sasaki et al,1994). Our objective is to obtain information for genes expressed at meiosis in higher plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding datasets obtained using such highthroughput sequencers, genomes of many plants have been published; reviewed by Paterson et al (2010). In addition, EST datasets have been published for hundreds of plant species, subspecies, and cultivars, before and in parallel with these genome decoding; reports on plant EST datasets of every family and genus are listed in Table 1 and Supplementary table, respectively, and reviewed (Batley et al 2003;Fedorova et al 2002;Hofte et al 1993;Keith et al 1993;Michalek et al 2002;Newman et al 1994;Park et al 1993;Rounsley et al 1996;Rudd 2003;Sasaki et al 1994;Shoemaker et al 2002;Uchimiya et al 1992;Yamamoto and Sasaki 1997;Yuan et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%