2008
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2008.4536518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial run-time reconfiguration of FPGA for computer vision applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) The traditional advantage of using a DAG computation model over a linear chain is that it permits tasks to be executed in parallel on different processors. In current FPGA systems, the response time is dominated by FPGA reconfiguration delays and not computation time [1,5,6]. This, along with the limited number of FPGAs available on a board, minimizes the traditional advantage of working directly with a DAG.…”
Section: Discussion Of Design Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) The traditional advantage of using a DAG computation model over a linear chain is that it permits tasks to be executed in parallel on different processors. In current FPGA systems, the response time is dominated by FPGA reconfiguration delays and not computation time [1,5,6]. This, along with the limited number of FPGAs available on a board, minimizes the traditional advantage of working directly with a DAG.…”
Section: Discussion Of Design Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gajjala Purna and Bhatia [5] reported that the hardware execution time for a set of four applications was on the order of tens of microseconds, while a single reconfiguration requires 242 milliseconds on the RACE architecture. More recently, Birla and Vikram [6] reported that an integral image computation was executed in 12.36 s with reconfiguration times ranging from 3.309 to 52.944 ms (depending on the configuration clock frequency). A feature extraction and classification computation had an execution time of 8.66 s with reconfiguration times ranging from 3.392 to 54.268 ms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A realtime video processing system using PR is described in [Bhandari et al 2009], where different image processing filters are implemented in the same reconfigurable region to reduce resource requirements and power consumption. In [Birla and Vikram 2008], the AdaBoost algorithm for human detection is implemented on a Virtex-4 FPGA using PR. Two computationally intensive tasks, integral image computation and feature extraction/decision, are alternately implemented in a single PRR, saving significant area.…”
Section: System Cost Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here a processor configures a PR region with different classification modules to evaluate the input pattern. In [98], the Ad-aBoost algorithm for human detection is implemented on a Virtex-4 FPGA using PR. Two computationally intensive tasks, integral image computation and feature extraction/decision, are alternately implemented in a single PR region.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%