1988
DOI: 10.1104/pp.87.3.741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Purification and Characterization of NADP+-Isocitrate Dehydrogenase from Immature Pod Walls of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Abstract: NADP'-isocitrate dehydrogenase (threo-DS-isocitrate: NADP' oxidoreductase [decarboxylating]; EC 1.1.1.42) (IDH) from pod walls of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) was purified 192-fold using ammonium sulfate fractionation, ion exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex A-50, and gel filtration through Sephadex G-200. The purified enzyme, having a molecular weight of about 126,000, exhibited a broad pH optima from 8.0 to 8.6. It was quite stable at 4°C and had an absolute requirement for a divalent cation, either Mg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The product of the reaction, 2-oxoglutarate, is an inhibitor for NADP*-ICDH as indicated by Omran and Dennis (1971) for pea leaves; NAD* at 10 mM, and EDTA at 1 mM slightly inhibit the activity of the purified enzyme, whereas the NADP*-ICDH isoenzymes present in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are more strongly affected by identical concentration of NAD* and EDTA, resulting in 30-50% and 100% inhibition, respectively (Martinez-Rivas and Vega 1994). ATP seems to inhibit the NADP*-1CDH activity in accordance with data presented by Omran and Dennis (1971), suggesting that the enzyme could be regulated by the concentration of ATP in the cell, but the NADP*-ICDH from chickpea (Gupta and Sing 1988) was not significantly affected by ATP. However, Omran and Dennis (1971) argued that ATP inhibition is the result of the chelation of the metal ion and so it is of poor regulatory meaning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The product of the reaction, 2-oxoglutarate, is an inhibitor for NADP*-ICDH as indicated by Omran and Dennis (1971) for pea leaves; NAD* at 10 mM, and EDTA at 1 mM slightly inhibit the activity of the purified enzyme, whereas the NADP*-ICDH isoenzymes present in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are more strongly affected by identical concentration of NAD* and EDTA, resulting in 30-50% and 100% inhibition, respectively (Martinez-Rivas and Vega 1994). ATP seems to inhibit the NADP*-1CDH activity in accordance with data presented by Omran and Dennis (1971), suggesting that the enzyme could be regulated by the concentration of ATP in the cell, but the NADP*-ICDH from chickpea (Gupta and Sing 1988) was not significantly affected by ATP. However, Omran and Dennis (1971) argued that ATP inhibition is the result of the chelation of the metal ion and so it is of poor regulatory meaning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This value is similar to the native M r of the enzyme from chickpea pod walls (126 kDa; Gupta and Singh 1988) and is in the range of values described for other higher-plant NADP +-IDH enzymes (82-152 kDa; Chen and Gadal 1990b). This value is similar to the native M r of the enzyme from chickpea pod walls (126 kDa; Gupta and Singh 1988) and is in the range of values described for other higher-plant NADP +-IDH enzymes (82-152 kDa; Chen and Gadal 1990b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although NADP-IDH from a number of plants has been isolated and characterized [9,15,23,30,34,35,36,42] and the heritability of IDH has been established in various species, little is known about the molecular genetics of NADP-IDH. On the basis ofisozyme analysis, Kiang and Gorman [27] concluded that there are four active IDH loci in soybeans, two that encode cytosol-associated isozymes and two that encode mitochondrial isozymes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%