1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199801)82:1<15::aid-sce2>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial possible models: An approach to interpret students' physical representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In middle school, they study the concept of density and use it to explain sinking and floating, or buoyancy in water. However, researchers (e.g., Camacho & Cazares, 1998; Hardy, Jonen, Moller, & Stern, 2006; Libarkin, Crockett, & Sadler, 2003; She, 2002) have reported that many middle and high school students hold naïve understandings of the phenomenon of buoyancy. Students attribute the sinking and floating of objects either to their size (large objects sink while small ones float), shape (e.g., a round object sinks while a boat‐shaped object floats), weight (heavy objects sink and light ones float), or material (e.g., an object that is metal‐like sinks).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In middle school, they study the concept of density and use it to explain sinking and floating, or buoyancy in water. However, researchers (e.g., Camacho & Cazares, 1998; Hardy, Jonen, Moller, & Stern, 2006; Libarkin, Crockett, & Sadler, 2003; She, 2002) have reported that many middle and high school students hold naïve understandings of the phenomenon of buoyancy. Students attribute the sinking and floating of objects either to their size (large objects sink while small ones float), shape (e.g., a round object sinks while a boat‐shaped object floats), weight (heavy objects sink and light ones float), or material (e.g., an object that is metal‐like sinks).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the opinions we share with Sherin Krakowski y Lee [25] is that students build their reasoning, and therefore, their explanations when they intend to answer questionings; this has also been expressed in the Possible Partial Models [26] where students construct their reasoning based on a set of constricting and corresponding ideas that come from previous cognitive resources.…”
Section: Children's Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial possible models (PPM): an approach to interpreting representations PPM are believed to be useful in analysing the relationships between representations that shape structures with a certain level of coherency (Flores-Camacho & Gallegos-Cázares., 1998;Gallegos-Cázares, Flores-Camacho, Calderón-Canales, Perrusquía-Máximo, & García-Rivera, 2014). In this proposal, the inferences and explanations that the subjects make can be described by a PPM model's components, made up of three sets: constricting ideas (CI); correspondence rules (CR); and the set of applications or phenomena (A) that can be described from the CI and CR elements.…”
Section: The Representational Analysis Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los Modelos Parciales Posibles (MPP): una forma de interpretación de las representaciones Para analizar las relaciones entre representaciones que conforman estructuras con cierto nivel de coherencia se consideran útiles los MPP (Flores-Camacho & Gallegos-Cázares., 1998;Gallegos-Cázares, Flores-Camacho, Calderón-Canales, Perrusquía-Máximo, & García-Rivera, 2014). En esta propuesta, las inferencias y explicaciones que hacen los sujetos pueden describirse por los componentes de un modelo MPP constituido por tres conjuntos: las ideas constrictoras (IC); las reglas de correspondencia (RC); el conjunto de aplicaciones o fenómenos (A) que pueden ser descritos a partir de los elementos de IC y RC.…”
Section: El Enfoque De Análisis Representacionalunclassified