1974
DOI: 10.1177/00359157740676p116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Nephrectomy — a Pathological Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this series and that reported from Leeds are directly comparable, it appears that partial nephrectomy reduces the risk of recurrent stone formation. The average weight of renal tissue removed in a recent series of 35 partial nephrectomies for stone was approximately 30 grams (Anderson, 1977), i.e. one-fifth of the weight of a normal kidney.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As this series and that reported from Leeds are directly comparable, it appears that partial nephrectomy reduces the risk of recurrent stone formation. The average weight of renal tissue removed in a recent series of 35 partial nephrectomies for stone was approximately 30 grams (Anderson, 1977), i.e. one-fifth of the weight of a normal kidney.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been claimed that partial nephrectomy does reduce this risk (Stewart, 1960; Papathanassiadis and Swinney, 1966;Hans and Backer, 1972). Recently the operation has been condemned as unsuitable for the majority of renal stones because it involves loss of renal tissue without proven benefit (Anderson, 1974;Marshall et al, 1975). However, there have been very few studies with the necessary prolonged and detailed follow-up after surgery to compare the results of partial nephrectomy with other operations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%