2009
DOI: 10.13001/1081-3810.1343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial isometries and EP elements in rings with involution

Abstract: Abstract. If R is a ring with involution, and a † is the Moore-Penrose inverse of a ∈ R, then the element a is called:In this paper, characterizations of partial isometries, EP elements and star-dagger elements in rings with involution are given. Thus, some well-known results are extended to more general settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…D. Mosić and D.S. Djordjevć also characterize partial isometries in terms of the pure theory of rings, generalizing known results for complex matrices (see [22,23]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D. Mosić and D.S. Djordjevć also characterize partial isometries in terms of the pure theory of rings, generalizing known results for complex matrices (see [22,23]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It should be noted that the Moore-Penrose inverse and the group inverse are useful in solving overdetermined systems of linear equations, and the importance of EP elements lies in the fact that they are characterized by the commutativity with their Moore-Penrose inverses. There are close connections among EP elements, partial isometries and normal elements in rings with involution (see [22,23]). …”
Section: Wx Chenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the left side of equalities (9) and (12) are equal, we observe that a * f,e a # a # = a # a * f,e a # and (xiv) is satisfied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Inspired by [2], characterizations of partial isometries, EP elements and star-dagger elements in rings with involution were investigated in [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no simple relation (except when a satisfies some concrete relation, see e.g. [7]) between a # and a † . One can guess that (a # ) † = (a † ) # .…”
Section: Proof Observe That Aqmentioning
confidence: 99%