1966
DOI: 10.1016/0031-8914(66)90115-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial ionization cross sections of noble gases for electrons with energy 0.5–16 keV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
87
1
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
15
87
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the Ne-K-ionization cross sections for proton [24][25][26] lized to a mean value at E=145keV) and the a(Ne 2+) data from Solovev et al [1] and Wexler [2] (extrapolated in the energy range 180 keV_< E < 800 keV) have been taken. In the case of electron impact the a(Ne +) and o-(Ne 2 § data of Schram et al [3] have been used, which are in good agreement with new absolute measurements of Nagy et al E4]. The absolute accuracy of the present a(2p 5) and a(2p 4) data is mainly determined by those of the a(Ne +) and o'(Ne z+) data, i.e.…”
Section: Measurements and Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We used the Ne-K-ionization cross sections for proton [24][25][26] lized to a mean value at E=145keV) and the a(Ne 2+) data from Solovev et al [1] and Wexler [2] (extrapolated in the energy range 180 keV_< E < 800 keV) have been taken. In the case of electron impact the a(Ne +) and o-(Ne 2 § data of Schram et al [3] have been used, which are in good agreement with new absolute measurements of Nagy et al E4]. The absolute accuracy of the present a(2p 5) and a(2p 4) data is mainly determined by those of the a(Ne +) and o'(Ne z+) data, i.e.…”
Section: Measurements and Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The discrepancy is possibly due to the contribution to the EIMI cross section of other indirect ionization processes, such as MIMA. We should also note that for quintuple ionization, there is a very large discrepancy of more than a factor of two between the measurements of Schram et al (1966) and Almeida et al (1995). The Schram et al (1966) results appear to be systematically low for all of the neon EIMI data (compare Figures 8 and 9), so we base the branching ratio above on the Almeida et al (1995) measurements.…”
Section: Ne-likementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should also note that for quintuple ionization, there is a very large discrepancy of more than a factor of two between the measurements of Schram et al (1966) and Almeida et al (1995). The Schram et al (1966) results appear to be systematically low for all of the neon EIMI data (compare Figures 8 and 9), so we base the branching ratio above on the Almeida et al (1995) measurements. We describe the direct quadruple ionization cross section using Equation (2) with p 0 ≈ 2.2 and the direct quintuple ionization is modeled with Equation (1) scaled by a factor of f = 0.005 to match the cross section below the IA threshold.…”
Section: Ne-likementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations