1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1987.tb02819.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial duplication 16q: report of two affected siblings resulting from a maternal translocation and literature review

Abstract: Two siblings with a partial duplication 16q, born to a woman with a balanced translocation (6; 16), are described. The first infant died at 8 weeks of age; the second died at 4 months. Fifteen other cases of duplications involving 16q have been reported, all of them derived from a balanced parental translocation. The most frequent physical findings have included dysmorphic facies characterized by high forehead, prominent nose, antimongoloid slant, malformed ears, and micrognathia, as well as flexion contractur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… References: (1) Schmickel et al [1975], (2) Masuno et al [2000], (3) Ridler and McKeown [1979], (4) Nevin et al [1983], (5) Hahm et al [1987], (6) Paladini et al [1999], (7) Chen et al [2004], (8) Chen et al [2005b], (9) Buckton and Barr [1981], (10) Davison and Beesley [1984], (11) Hatanaka et al [1984], (12) Dowman et al [1989], (13) Balestrazzi et al [1979], (14) Garau et al [1980], (15) Rethoré et al [1982], (16) Calva et al [1984], (17) Lessick et al [1989], (18) Nyhan et al [1989], (19) Maher et al [1991], (20) Houlston et al [1994], (21) Sousa et al [2004], (22) Chen et al [2005a], (23) Giardino et al [2001], (24) Brisset et al [2002], (25) Zahn et al [2005], (26) Magnelli [1976], (27) Yunis et al [1977], (28) Jalal et al [1989], (29) Léonard et al [1992], and (30) Rochat et al [2007]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… References: (1) Schmickel et al [1975], (2) Masuno et al [2000], (3) Ridler and McKeown [1979], (4) Nevin et al [1983], (5) Hahm et al [1987], (6) Paladini et al [1999], (7) Chen et al [2004], (8) Chen et al [2005b], (9) Buckton and Barr [1981], (10) Davison and Beesley [1984], (11) Hatanaka et al [1984], (12) Dowman et al [1989], (13) Balestrazzi et al [1979], (14) Garau et al [1980], (15) Rethoré et al [1982], (16) Calva et al [1984], (17) Lessick et al [1989], (18) Nyhan et al [1989], (19) Maher et al [1991], (20) Houlston et al [1994], (21) Sousa et al [2004], (22) Chen et al [2005a], (23) Giardino et al [2001], (24) Brisset et al [2002], (25) Zahn et al [2005], (26) Magnelli [1976], (27) Yunis et al [1977], (28) Jalal et al [1989], (29) Léonard et al [1992], and (30) Rochat et al [2007]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 7.5 Mb duplication was identified on the long arm of chromosome 16 occupying most of 16q11q12 locus. Previous reports have described an association between large duplications of chromosome 16 and cardiac malformations (Hahm, Chitayat, Iqbal, Cho, & Nitowsky, ; Odak, Barišić, Morožin Pohovski, Riegel, & Schinzel, ). Five genes within the identified duplicated region, RPGRIP1L , RBL2, SALL1, NKD1 , and MYLK3 have been previously linked with heart development and heart abnormalities and could potentially be related to HRHS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For each segment, reported phenotypes are counted using the + symbol. References for cases in the table: q11!qter: (Eggermann et al, 1998;Hahm et al, 1987;Nevin et al, 1983;Ridler & McKeown, 1979); q12!qter: (Chen et al, 2003;Paladini et al, 1999); q13!qter: (Buckton & Barr, 1981;Davison & Beesley, 1984;Dowman et al, 1989;Hatanaka et al, 1984;Luberda-Zapa snik et al, 1995); q21!qter: (Balestrazzi et al, 1979;Calva et al, 1984;de Carvalho et al, 2010;Garau et al, 1980;Lessick et al, 1989;Maher et al, 1991;Mishra et al, 2018;Yue et al, 2019); q22!qter: (Basinko et al, 2011;Houlston et al, 1994;Nyhan et al, 1989;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each segment, reported phenotypes are counted using the + symbol. References for cases in the table: q11 → qter: (Eggermann et al, 1998; Hahm et al, 1987; Nevin et al, 1983; Ridler & McKeown, 1979); q12 → qter: (Chen et al, 2003; Paladini et al, 1999); q13 → qter: (Buckton & Barr, 1981; Davison & Beesley, 1984; Dowman et al, 1989; Hatanaka et al, 1984; Luberda‐Zapaśnik et al, 1995); q21 → qter: (Balestrazzi et al, 1979; Calva et al, 1984; de Carvalho et al, 2010; Garau et al, 1980; Lessick et al, 1989; Maher et al, 1991; Mishra et al, 2018; Yue et al, 2019); q22 → qter: (Basinko et al, 2011; Houlston et al, 1994; Nyhan et al, 1989; Rethoré et al, 1982; Sousa et al, 2004; Tsien et al, 2005); q23 → qter: (Basinko et al, 2011; Maher et al, 1991; Papadopoulou et al, 2017; Savary et al, 1991); q24 → qter: (Baker et al, 2002; Brisset et al, 2002; Ferrero et al, 2006; Giardino et al, 2001; Maher et al, 1991; Zahn et al, 2005; Zhou et al, 2013); Unknown: (Eriksson et al, 1971; Ferguson Jr. & Hicks, 1987; Francke, 1972). These publications did not utilize modern chromosome analysis techniques; however, the phenotypic description is most consistent with involvement of large segment of 16q; for reference (Francke, 1972), the relevant case is #10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%