2019
DOI: 10.1109/mei.2019.8735667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial discharge detection and diagnosis in gas insulated switchgear: State of the art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different PD analysis techniques for condition monitoring are performed for PD detection, identification, and diagnosis [27]. Several techniques were developed to detect PD including electrical detection [28]- [32], electromagnetic detection [26], [33]- [37], optical detection [38]- [40], acoustic detection [41]- [45], gas presence detection [16], [46]- [48], and combinational methods [41], [49], [50]. PD sources signals are received through a detector and are further analyzed to identify the locations and severity of insulation defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different PD analysis techniques for condition monitoring are performed for PD detection, identification, and diagnosis [27]. Several techniques were developed to detect PD including electrical detection [28]- [32], electromagnetic detection [26], [33]- [37], optical detection [38]- [40], acoustic detection [41]- [45], gas presence detection [16], [46]- [48], and combinational methods [41], [49], [50]. PD sources signals are received through a detector and are further analyzed to identify the locations and severity of insulation defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the literature is extremely vast. PD detection has been studied in many systems such as in transformers [ 4 ], gas-insulated high-voltage switchgear [ 5 ], power plants [ 6 ], and power lines [ 7 ]. The main challenge in PD detection lies in the detection of extremely short and temporally localized events: their wavelength is at the micro-second scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the classification methods of GIS PD pattern recognition, there are currently two types of popular methodstraditional machine learning methods supported by feature engineering and deep learning methods with the advantage of automatic feature extraction. Based on the principal component analysis and autoencoder [8,9], feature engineering, which uses Fourier transform, wavelet transform, empirical mode decomposition, and S-transform to construct the feature [10,11], artificially selects the key feature parameters to represent PD and then realises PD pattern recognition by support vector machines, decision trees, random forests, artificial neural networks, and other classifiers [12][13][14]. However, traditional machine learning relies too heavily on expert experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%