Partial disassembly sequence planning based on cost-benefit analysis

Smith, Shana; Hsu, Li‐Che; Smith, G. C. Moore

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.095

Cited by 86 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since environmental issues such as material starvation have become serious [1], economical reuse and recycling should be required to recover parts and materials from End-of-life (EOL) assembled products [2] [3]. Reuse is the recovery of EOL products with maintaining the functions of the product, while recycling is the recovery of EOL products without maintaining the functions [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From the environmental aspects, it is desirable to disassemble all the parts of the EOL products for reuse and recycling. As the assembled products are composed of variety of materials and parts, manual disassembly is still required which tends to have higher cost due to labor work [2] [3]. Therefore, disassembling the all parts within the product becomes impractical by higher cost [4] [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, disassembling the all parts within the product becomes impractical by higher cost [4] [5]. To overcome this issue, partial or selective disassembly methods are researched [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. Smith et al (2016) [3] decided for each part to repair, replace, or recycle or to shred, but life time parameter or obsolescence are not considered.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To overcome this issue, partial or selective disassembly methods are researched [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. Smith et al (2016) [3] decided for each part to repair, replace, or recycle or to shred, but life time parameter or obsolescence are not considered. Kibum et al (2006) [8] considered refurbish which is one type of reuse.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They used Recyclability Evaluation Method developed by Hitachi Ltd [10] [11] and 3D-CAD product models to estimate the recycling rate and cost. Though the reuse is more environmentally and economically friendly than recycling [3] [12], they considered only recycling and disposal, and the parts reuse was not considered. Moreover, the reuse parts of EOL assembled products brings obsolescence, which occurs [3] due to its life expectancy and usage years of the EOL assembled product.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Disassembly Parts Selection for Recovery Rate and Cost Considering Reuse

Hasegawa¹,

Kinoshita²,

Yamada³

et al. 2018

dtetr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since material starvation has become a serious issue, reuse and recycling are required to recover parts and materials from End-of-life assembled products. As the assembled products are composed of variety of parts, manual disassembly is required that has higher cost. To establish environmental and economic recycling factories, a disassembly parts selection is carried out to promote higher a recovery rate but the lower cost. The environmental and economical disassembly parts selection by material recycling and disposing has been proposed in the literature. However, the reuse for the parts has not been considered. This study proposes the disassembly parts selection with the reuse. First, data sets for the disassembly parts selection are addressed. Second, a disassembly parts selection with the reuse is formulated by using integer programming with ε constraint method. Third, behaviors of the recovery rate for the cost are observed in a case of a computer. Finally, changes of length of life time are analyzed.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%