2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial dehulling of barley effect the concentrations of both gross and ileal digestible amino acids in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ATTD of DM, GE, OM, NDF, and ADF in dehulled barley were increased compared with the unprocessed hulled barley confirming the fact that DE and ME levels were improved due to partial dehulling of barley. The digestibility and retention rate of N were not changed in the current study and this is consistent with the results reported by Hennig et al [ 22 ]. The decreases in digestibility and metabolizability of energy are presumably related to the relatively high fiber concentration in barley compared with corn.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The ATTD of DM, GE, OM, NDF, and ADF in dehulled barley were increased compared with the unprocessed hulled barley confirming the fact that DE and ME levels were improved due to partial dehulling of barley. The digestibility and retention rate of N were not changed in the current study and this is consistent with the results reported by Hennig et al [ 22 ]. The decreases in digestibility and metabolizability of energy are presumably related to the relatively high fiber concentration in barley compared with corn.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The digestibility and retention rate of N were not changed in the current study and this is consistent with the results reported by Hennig et al [22]. The decreases in digestibility and metabolizability of energy are presumably related to the relatively high fiber concentration in barley compared with corn.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations