2013
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-2013-11724-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial crossed product description of the 𝐶*-algebras associated with integral domains

Abstract: Recently, Cuntz and Li introduced the C * -algebra A[R] associated to an integral domain R with finite quotients. In this paper, we show that A[R] is a partial group algebra of the group K ⋊ K × with suitable relations, where K is the field of fractions of R. We identify the spectrum of this relations and we show that it is homeomorphic to the profinite completion of R. By using partial crossed product theory, we reconstruct some results proved by Cuntz and Li. Among them, we prove that A[R] is simple by showi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that U = X g i is (G, τ X )-paradoxical. for m, m ′ ∈ R × and n, n ′ ∈ R. Following Boava and Exel [5], let K denote the field of fractions of R, and K × the set K\{0}. Let G be the semidirect product K ⋊ K × = {(u, w) : u ∈ K, w ∈ K × } equipped with the following operations (u, w)(u ′ , w ′ ) = (u + u ′ w, ww ′ ) and (u, w) −1 = (−u/w, 1/w).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We conclude that U = X g i is (G, τ X )-paradoxical. for m, m ′ ∈ R × and n, n ′ ∈ R. Following Boava and Exel [5], let K denote the field of fractions of R, and K × the set K\{0}. Let G be the semidirect product K ⋊ K × = {(u, w) : u ∈ K, w ∈ K × } equipped with the following operations (u, w)(u ′ , w ′ ) = (u + u ′ w, ww ′ ) and (u, w) −1 = (−u/w, 1/w).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G be the semidirect product K ⋊ K × = {(u, w) : u ∈ K, w ∈ K × } equipped with the following operations (u, w)(u ′ , w ′ ) = (u + u ′ w, ww ′ ) and (u, w) −1 = (−u/w, 1/w). As in [5] we define a partial order on K × given by w ≤ w ′ if w ′ = wr for some r ∈ R. Let (w) denote the ideal wR ⊆ K.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In cases such as this, we still have that the Vershik map is a homeomorphism between open subsets of the path space, and we can hence study it as a partial action of Z (the Vershik map has been studied as a partially defined map before in the literature, see [23,27]). Partial actions were originally defined in [11] and gradually gained importance as many C*-algebras and algebras were realized as partial crossed products (approximately finite, Bunce-Deddens and Cuntz-Krieger algebras, graph algebras, Leavitt path algebras, algebras associated with integral domains, and self-similar graph algebras among others, see [6,8,12,13,14,16,24]). In the topological category a partial action of Z provides the correct setting to study the dynamics of a partial homeomorphism: given a homeomorphism h : U → V between two open sets of the topological space X one considers the iterates h n , with n ∈ Z, restricted to the appropriate domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%