2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial 26S rDNA restriction analysis as a tool to characterise non-Saccharomyces yeasts present during red wine fermentations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primers used for amplification of the D1/D2 domain of the 26S rDNA region were NL1 (5= GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG 3=) and NL4 (5= GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG 3=) as described previously (21). PCRs were performed as described by Baleiras Couto et al (22) and Esteve-Zarzoso et al (23). The resulting sequences were compared with those available in the GenBank database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primers used for amplification of the D1/D2 domain of the 26S rDNA region were NL1 (5= GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG 3=) and NL4 (5= GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG 3=) as described previously (21). PCRs were performed as described by Baleiras Couto et al (22) and Esteve-Zarzoso et al (23). The resulting sequences were compared with those available in the GenBank database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the enological relevance, all Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates were differentiated applying two genotypic tools (interdelta analysis and microsatellite multiplex PCR of polymorphic microsatellite loci) that recognized 51 strains. Based on the low production of H 2 S, acetic acid and foam, ethanol resistance, growth in presence of high concentrations of potassium metabisulphite (KMBS) and CuSO 4 and at low temperatures, 14 strains were selected and used as starter to ferment grape must at 13 C and 17 C in presence of 100 mg/L of KMBS. Three strains (CS160, CS165 and CS182) showed optimal technological aptitudes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard DNA ladders were 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen) and GeneRuler 50 pb DNA Ladder (MBI Fermentas). Five isolates representative of each group were subjected to an additional enzymatic restriction targeting the 26 rRNA gene following the methodology reported by Baleiras-Couto et al (13). One isolate per group was further processed by sequencing the D1/D2 region of the 26S rRNA gene and/or 5.8S-ITS rRNA region to confirm the preliminary identification obtained by RFLP analysis (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connell et al [22] adapted this same technique for the detection of D. bruxellensis in winery air. [5,22,40,55,113] Yeast targets Direct Species to strain [18,49,61] QPCR Bacterial targets Direct Currently species but depending on the target gene they may be strain specific [45,78,106] Yeast targets Direct Currently species [27,45,47,89,93,108] Both papers consider this method to be a form of in situ hybridization, however, in this case it is not a direct detection method, as the probes are used on an enriched culture grown on media. Even though the technique takes less time than traditional indirect methods, growth of the organism is still needed.…”
Section: Hybridization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ARDRA typing has typically been performed to identify yeast species using the ITS regions discussed above, Balerias Couto et al [5] used restriction enzyme analysis of the 26S rDNA to characterize non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine. Additionally, restriction analysis of the 16S rDNA region in bacteria has also been used to identify both Lactobacilli and acetic acid bacteria associated with wine [96,98].…”
Section: Fingerprinting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%