Die Große Koalition 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92451-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parteien und Parteiensystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…305 Vor allem hat sich seit der Bundestagswahl 2005 das fortgesetzt, was Schelsky und Beck zuvor prognostiziert haben: Das Parteiensystem, repräsentiert durch die zwei do-301 Wie Richard Stöss anmerkt, ist die Kritik an den politischen Parteien nicht neu. Sie ist in Deutschland "so alt wie die Parteien selbst" (Stöss 1990: 15) minierenden Volksparteien SPD und CDU, hat sich zu einem asymmetrischen "fluiden Fünfparteiensystem" gewandelt (Niedermayer 2008(Niedermayer , 2010. Vorangeschoben wird diese Entwicklung durch eine Vielzahl an Interessengruppen (Vereine, Initiativen, Soziale Bewegungen), politischen Gruppierungen bis hin zu Einzelakteuren.…”
Section: Bisunclassified
“…305 Vor allem hat sich seit der Bundestagswahl 2005 das fortgesetzt, was Schelsky und Beck zuvor prognostiziert haben: Das Parteiensystem, repräsentiert durch die zwei do-301 Wie Richard Stöss anmerkt, ist die Kritik an den politischen Parteien nicht neu. Sie ist in Deutschland "so alt wie die Parteien selbst" (Stöss 1990: 15) minierenden Volksparteien SPD und CDU, hat sich zu einem asymmetrischen "fluiden Fünfparteiensystem" gewandelt (Niedermayer 2008(Niedermayer , 2010. Vorangeschoben wird diese Entwicklung durch eine Vielzahl an Interessengruppen (Vereine, Initiativen, Soziale Bewegungen), politischen Gruppierungen bis hin zu Einzelakteuren.…”
Section: Bisunclassified
“…In fact, Zolleis (2008) places the responsibility in part at least at the door of her predecessors and an appetite for an economic reform agenda that had gained the ascendancy in the CDU since the 1990s. In the view of Kurbjuweit, the political near-death experience in the 2005 elections served as a wakeup call for Merkel to disown her party’s reformist zeal, reboot her relationship with the electorate, and achieve a symbiosis with the German people (Clemens, 2007; Kurbjuweit, 2009; Niedermayer, 2010). Zolleis (2009) shares this perspective as an explanation for the subsequent political repositioning Merkel engineered in her party: As the CDU/CSU (Christian Social Union) and her preferred partner – the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) – for the second time in a decade failed to muster the votes needed to form a coalition, Merkel saw her CDU’s pivotal position in German politics at risk unless it embraced a review of policies that would allow her to tap into new electoral segments and become compatible for a wider range of coalition partners (Decker, 2008; Schroeder and Neumann, 2010; Zolleis, 2009).…”
Section: Assessing Merkel’s Chancellorship I: a Winning Electoral mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-party system of modern reunified Germany is a very different thing from the three-party system of the 1970s, and this obviously has an effect on the formation of governing coalitions. 131 It should also be mentioned that any apparent acquiescence of the Social Democrats in the alleged rule in 2005 by agreeing to coalesce under Merkel may simply have been a convenient means of making the outcome of coalition negotiations more palatable to their own supporters, many of whom were bitterly disappointed to see the party no longer providing the chancellor after an unexpectedly good showing in the elections. 132 Too much, therefore, should not be read into the single test case we have.…”
Section: Two Possible Future Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%