2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part-scale thermal simulation of laser powder bed fusion using graph theory: Effect of thermal history on porosity, microstructure evolution, and recoater crash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 15 shows four photographs of the produced parts. After successfully manufacturing the designed parts, students are tasked with visually inspecting the surface quality of the parts on the build plate and reporting any F I G U R E 15 (a) Renishaw AM 400 at CAVS MSU [45], (b) an illustrative schematic of the LPBF process [63], manufactured specimens from Afify et al [2] such as (c) front view, (d) back view, (e) side view (Reproduced from Afify et al [2], with permission from Springer Nature). damaged regions that may arise due to uncontrolled residual stresses.…”
Section: Lpbf Production Phase and Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 15 shows four photographs of the produced parts. After successfully manufacturing the designed parts, students are tasked with visually inspecting the surface quality of the parts on the build plate and reporting any F I G U R E 15 (a) Renishaw AM 400 at CAVS MSU [45], (b) an illustrative schematic of the LPBF process [63], manufactured specimens from Afify et al [2] such as (c) front view, (d) back view, (e) side view (Reproduced from Afify et al [2], with permission from Springer Nature). damaged regions that may arise due to uncontrolled residual stresses.…”
Section: Lpbf Production Phase and Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Renishaw AM 400 at CAVS MSU [45], (b) an illustrative schematic of the LPBF process [63], manufactured specimens from Afify et al [2] such as (c) front view, (d) back view, (e) side view (Reproduced from Afify et al [2], with permission from Springer Nature).…”
Section: Development Of a Cad/cae/cam Project‐based Laboratory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonuniform geometries can result in varying heat flow through the part, thus leading to different thermal properties affecting the microstructure and part quality. Therefore, understanding the correlation between thermal history and material properties are the bases of recent investigations [15][16][17][18][19]. Both Williams et al [15] and Mohr et al [16] studied the effects of varying inter-layer cooling times during PBF-LB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a prediction of part defects dependent on geometrical features, Paulson et al [18] established machine-learning models that correlate thermal histories of single-track deposits to subsurface porosity formation. Similarly, Yavari et al [19] introduced a graph theory approach to predict thermal history trends that lead to flaw formation. A correlation between part geometry and thermal history was found, thus influencing the occurrence of build failures, type and severity of porosity as well as morphology of the microstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research addresses the foregoing challenge by devising a mesh-free graph theory-based computational thermal modeling approach to predict the temperature distribution in DED parts. The graph theory approach has previously been published in the context of the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process (Yavari et al , 2019; Cole et al , 2020; Yavari et al , 2020; Gaikwad et al , 2020; Yavari et al , 2021a, 2021b, 2021c). The approach is verified to be five to ten times faster than FE modeling, enabling the prediction of thermal history using desktop computing in the context of the LPBF process. This paper develops, applies and validates the graph theory approach in the context of the DED process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%