1956
DOI: 10.17161/dt.v0i0.5541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part F, Coelenterata, Complete Volume

Abstract: The name of the type species of each genus and subgenus is given next following the generic name with its accompanying author and date, or after entries needed for definition of the name if it is involved in homonymy. The originally published combination of generic and trivial names for this species is cited, accompanied by an asterisk (to), with notation of the author and date of original publication. An exception in this procedure is made, however, if the species was first published in the same

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… Chrysogorgia Duchassaing and Michelotti 1864: 13; Versluys 1902: 17–33; Kükenthal 1919: 505–511 (key to species); 1924: 388–390 (key to species); Bayer 1956: F216; Bayer and Stefani 1988: 259 (key to genus and some species); Cairns 2001: 754–756; Pante and France 2010: 600 (key to genus); Pante et al 2012: fig. 2.…”
Section: Systematic Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Chrysogorgia Duchassaing and Michelotti 1864: 13; Versluys 1902: 17–33; Kükenthal 1919: 505–511 (key to species); 1924: 388–390 (key to species); Bayer 1956: F216; Bayer and Stefani 1988: 259 (key to genus and some species); Cairns 2001: 754–756; Pante and France 2010: 600 (key to genus); Pante et al 2012: fig. 2.…”
Section: Systematic Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Isidella Gray 1858: 283; Kükenthal 1919: 564; 1924: 414; Bayer 1956: F222; Bayer and Stefani 1987a: 51 (key to genus); 1987b: 941 (key to genus); Bayer 1990: 207–208; Etnoyer 2008: 543; Brugler and France 2008: 126–127 (inverted gene order); Watling et al 2011: 76, fig. 2.11 (map); Dueñas et al 2014: 20.…”
Section: Systematic Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sclerites illustrated in Nutting (1912: pl 20, fig 3), while of comparable size to that indicated for the species described here, do not match. In considering overall appearance of polyps on the branches, and the manner in which sclerites covered the surface of the polyps from distal to proximal ends, a generic best fit occurred working from an illustration that was given in Bayer (1956a) for Acalycigorgia . However, Fabricius and Alderslade (2001) have stated that “(m)any species of Acanthogorgia , in which the polyp sclerites are so short that there is little or no projecting crown, erroneously appear in the literature under the name Acalycigorgia Kükenthal, 1919.…”
Section: Systematic Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fabricius and Alderslade (2001) discussed aspects of comparison/contrast between this genus and others; it was stated, “not much separates this genus from Anthogorgia , and a study of a large suite of specimens could see the two synonymized.” Additionally, a characteristic feature pertinent to the genus diagnosis came from the Octocoral Taxonomy Laboratory Manual (2007): There are no calyces in the genus Muricella ; “almost 90% of the species attributed to this genus do not belong there. A major revision is needed.” In reviewing older literature there were references to calyces in this genus; Bayer (1956a) comments on the “truncated cones” or “rounded, low verrucae.” In descriptions given by Verrill (1869a), reference is made to calyces, as well. The concept of how to define a calyx may need revisiting, notably with regards to this genus.…”
Section: Systematic Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation