1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf02291836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part and bipartial canonical correlation analysis

Abstract: multivariate analysis,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the structure vector and standardized cross loadings reported in Table 5 are correlations between redundancy component and the original predictor (X) and criterion variables (Y ) rather than their constrained counterparts (XH X and Y H Y ). Table 6 provides part redundancies (Timm and Carlson, 1976) for all 153 combinations. The total redundancy is 72.33 for the combination of [9] X and [1] Y .…”
Section: An Example Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the structure vector and standardized cross loadings reported in Table 5 are correlations between redundancy component and the original predictor (X) and criterion variables (Y ) rather than their constrained counterparts (XH X and Y H Y ). Table 6 provides part redundancies (Timm and Carlson, 1976) for all 153 combinations. The total redundancy is 72.33 for the combination of [9] X and [1] Y .…”
Section: An Example Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is known in the literature as partial canonical correlation analysis (see e.g. Rao (1969), Timm and Carlson (1976)). Then this last analysis appears as a particular case of the general relative canonical analysis of subspaces (see Dauxois and Nkiet (2002), Dauxois et al (2004)), obtained by considering subspaces generated by specific linear functions of the original variables.…”
Section: E L2(fi Ap) For All Operator T We Will Denote By T* Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to show up this property we prefer to use the terminology linear relative canonical analysis instead of partial canonical analysis. Notice that the part and bipartial canonical correlation analysis developed by Timm and Carlson (1976) can be reobtained from our framework by considering the CA of E1 and E2.3, and E1.3 and E2.4 respectively, where E2.4 is constructed as in equation (2.2) with another Euclidean r.v. )(4.…”
Section: E L2(fi Ap) For All Operator T We Will Denote By T* Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations