2015
DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
311
2
20

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 766 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(134 reference statements)
4
311
2
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and AHA guidelines recommend a CC rate between 100 and 120 per minute (cpm) [23,24]. According to the literature, the strong consensus about the target CC depth and CC rate has not yet been reached [25,26].…”
Section: Both European and American Guidelines For Resuscitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and AHA guidelines recommend a CC rate between 100 and 120 per minute (cpm) [23,24]. According to the literature, the strong consensus about the target CC depth and CC rate has not yet been reached [25,26].…”
Section: Both European and American Guidelines For Resuscitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This study showed that patient survival to hospital discharge was highest when compressions were between 100 and 120 per minute, 1 which is reflected in the latest update of the resuscitation guideline from the American Heart Association. 2 …”
Section: Chest Compressions During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Shoumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current application of S-CPR is based on the technique of "external chest compression" that was defined by Kouwenhoven in 1960 and comprises the phases of active compression and passive decompression. Despite the evolution of resuscitation medicine, the limited improvement in survival rates following cardiac arrest has led researchers to explore the possibility of different CPR techniques and also to develop devices that support ventilation and circulation (2)(3)(4)(5)(6). This manuscript was prepared to review the experimental and clinical studies conducted on the historical progress and effectiveness of mechanical chest compression devices (MCCD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%