Synaptic dynamics differ markedly across connections and strongly regulate how action potentials are being communicated. To model the range of synaptic dynamics observed in experiments, we develop a flexible mathematical framework based on a linear-nonlinear operation. This model can capture various experimentally observed features of synaptic dynamics and different types of heteroskedasticity. Despite its conceptual simplicity, we show it is more adaptable than previous models. Combined with a standard maximum likelihood approach, synaptic dynamics can be accurately and efficiently characterized using naturalistic stimulation patterns. These results make explicit that synaptic processing bears algorithmic similarities with information processing in convolutional neural networks.
Author summaryUnderstanding how information is transmitted relies heavily on knowledge of the underlying regulatory synaptic dynamics. Existing computational models for capturing such dynamics are often either very complex or too restrictive. As a result, effectively capturing the different types of dynamics observed experimentally remains a challenging problem. Here, we propose a mathematically flexible linear-nonlinear model that is capable of efficiently characterizing synaptic dynamics. We demonstrate the ability of this model to capture different features of experimentally observed data.The nervous system has evolved a communication system largely based on temporal 2 sequences of action potentials. A central feature of this communication is that action 3 potentials are communicated with variable efficacy on short (10 ms -10 s) time 4 scales [1-6]. The dynamics of synaptic efficacy at short time scales, or short-term 5 plasticity (STP), can be a powerful determinant of the flow of information, allowing the 6 same axon to communicate independent messages to different post-synaptic 7 targets [7, 8]. Properties of STP vary markedly across projections [9-11], leading to the 8idea that connections can be conceived as belonging to distinct classes [12,13] and that 9 these distinct classes shape information transmission in vivo [14][15][16]. Thus, to 10 May 29, 2020 1/25 understand the flow of information in neuronal networks, the connectome must be 11 indexed with an accurate description of STP properties.
12One approach to characterizing synaptic dynamics is to perform targeted 13 experiments and extract a summary feature, most commonly the paired-pulse 14 ratio [5,[17][18][19], whereby a synapse can be classified as short-term depressing (STD) or 15 short-term facilitating (STF). However, a single summary feature is insufficient to 16 capture the full extent of STP diversity. Longer or more complex stimulation patterns 17 are required to describe delayed facilitation onset [6], biphasic STP [20, 21] or the 18 distinction between supra-and sub-linear facilitation [22]. Such atypical STP dynamics 19 challenge the traditional dichotomy of STF and STD and suggest that more complex 20 phenotypes can exist and contribute to network function in...