2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PARP-inhibitors in epithelial ovarian cancer: Actual positioning and future expectations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the approval of PARPi in both front-line and recurrent settings, including HGSOC [ 24 , 51 ], PARPi resistance is an emerging clinical problem. While HR deficiency is generally a biomarker of sensitivity, HR proficiency is in most cases a marker of resistance, even though PARPi’s clinical activity in HR-proficient tumors has also been reported [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the approval of PARPi in both front-line and recurrent settings, including HGSOC [ 24 , 51 ], PARPi resistance is an emerging clinical problem. While HR deficiency is generally a biomarker of sensitivity, HR proficiency is in most cases a marker of resistance, even though PARPi’s clinical activity in HR-proficient tumors has also been reported [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the approval of PARPi in both front-line and recurrent settings, including HGSOC [ 24 , 51 ], PARPi resistance is an emerging clinical problem. While HR deficiency is generally a biomarker of sensitivity, HR proficiency is in most cases a marker of resistance, even though PARPi’s clinical activity in HR-proficient tumors has also been reported [ 51 ]. Most of the mechanisms of PARPi resistance come from studies on the few in vitro models selected for acquired resistance and on tumor samples from PARPi pretreated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the BRCA* cohort exhibited a median PFS of 4.3 (olaparib) versus 2.8 months (placebo) (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37–0.87; p = 0.022), while BRCA wt showed a median PFS of 5.3 (olaparib) versus 2.8 months (placebo) (HR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.26–0.71; p = 0.002). This seminal work paved the way for “PARPi rechallenge” [ 120 ] and raised new questions regarding the deciphering of predictive markers.…”
Section: Emerging Strategies and Perspectives For Accurate And Dynami...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PARP inhibitors are now well known and widely used in ovarian cancer patients, while more precise molecular markers are needed to select patients and monitor treatment response ( 3 ). Nakanishi et al.…”
Section: Ovarian Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%