2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2020.102493
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parity in Planck full-mission CMB temperature maps

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equipped with a different estimator, Kim & Naselsky (2010) found the significance level was higher when they applied it to WMAP 7-yr temperature anisotropy data. More work has been done to better understand this anomaly since then (e.g., Kim et al 2012;Cheng et al 2016;Aluri et al 2017;Panda et al 2021). The corresponding result in Planck Collaboration VII (2020) based on the Planck 2018 data (significance above 3σ for temperature) also indicates that this anomaly deserves investigation.…”
Section: Point-parity Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Equipped with a different estimator, Kim & Naselsky (2010) found the significance level was higher when they applied it to WMAP 7-yr temperature anisotropy data. More work has been done to better understand this anomaly since then (e.g., Kim et al 2012;Cheng et al 2016;Aluri et al 2017;Panda et al 2021). The corresponding result in Planck Collaboration VII (2020) based on the Planck 2018 data (significance above 3σ for temperature) also indicates that this anomaly deserves investigation.…”
Section: Point-parity Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Equipped with a different estimator, Kim & Naselsky (2010) found the significance level was higher when they applied it to WMAP seven year temperature anisotropy data. More work has been done to better understand this anomaly since then (e.g., Gruppuso et al 2011;Kim et al 2012;Cheng et al 2016;Aluri et al 2017;Panda et al 2021). The corresponding result in Planck Collaboration VII (2020) based on the Planck 2018 data (significance above 3σ for temperature) also indicates that this anomaly deserves investigation.…”
Section: Point-parity Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…let us now address the deviation from the even-odd parity balance employing the parity statistic [21] as done in [12] P ( max ) = P + ( max ) P − ( max ) ;…”
Section: Parity Statistic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%