2018
DOI: 10.3233/jad-180087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parietal Involvement in the Semantic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia with Alzheimer’s Disease Cerebrospinal Fluid Profile

Abstract: Semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) is typically associated with non-Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, some anatomopathological studies have found AD lesions in those patients. We compared brain perfusion SPECT of 18 svPPA patients with CSF biomarkers indicative of non-Alzheimer pathology (svPPA-nonAD) and three svPPA patients with CSF biomarkers indicative of underlying AD (svPPA-AD). All svPPA patients had severe left temporopolar hypoperfusion. SvPPA-nonAD had additional anter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with svPPA and AD pathology demonstrated a more widespread cerebral hypoperfusion than patients with svPPA and TDP43 pathology. Hypoperfusion areas encompass the inferior parietal lobule, posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus, similar to patients with typical AD ( 47 – 49 ). Brain atrophy extended to the inferior parietal lobule, and increased p-tau levels in the CSF suggested AD pathology in the present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Patients with svPPA and AD pathology demonstrated a more widespread cerebral hypoperfusion than patients with svPPA and TDP43 pathology. Hypoperfusion areas encompass the inferior parietal lobule, posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus, similar to patients with typical AD ( 47 – 49 ). Brain atrophy extended to the inferior parietal lobule, and increased p-tau levels in the CSF suggested AD pathology in the present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It is also important to further investigate the similarities and differences between bvAD and dAD, which were initially considered a single subtype. Additionally, AD pathology can cause other phenotypes not described in this review, such as motor variant of AD or even svPPA, which have been previously described as clinically indistinguishable from patients with non-AD svPPA but have a parietal involvement that is absent in the others [31]. While progress has been made in diagnosing atypical AD, more longitudinal studies are needed to understand the disease progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the latest updated version [5], the diagnosis of atypical Alzheimer's disease requires the presence of (1) a clinical phenotype consistent with one of the atypical presentations (visual/posterior variant, logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, and frontal variant) and (2) biological, genetic, and/or in vivo molecular imaging signs supporting the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. However, more new clinical phenotypes have recently been identified as clinical variants of Alzheimer's disease, including patients with semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia [6] or with corticobasal syndrome [7]. Those new clinical variants add to the taxonomy of Alzheimer's disease, highlight a large variability among patients, and importantly pose major challenges for the diagnosis of early-onset Alzheimer variants [8], emphasizing the importance of in vivo biomarkers for diagnosis.…”
Section: The Complexity Of Early-onset Alzheimer's Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%